

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bye Bye Magnum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17241</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17241</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The Magnum got killed because too many people have their heads up their a55 and will only consider an SUV/CUV.  That and the fact that Dodge didn&#039;t market the Magnum at all after the first year.  The Magnum was a great looking car (IMHO) with above average performance tghat could do what 99% of the SUVs on the road today can do with much better driving dynamics.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The Magnum got killed because too many people have their heads up their a55 and will only consider an SUV/CUV.  That and the fact that Dodge didn&#8217;t market the Magnum at all after the first year.  The Magnum was a great looking car (IMHO) with above average performance tghat could do what 99% of the SUVs on the road today can do with much better driving dynamics.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemi-Lover</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17242</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemi-Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17242</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Hey nice pic!! The magnum may only be a station wagon to some, but to the owners it&#039;s a one of a kind special automobile. It&#039;s a shame to see it go, but I&#039;ll be holding on to mine!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Hey nice pic!! The magnum may only be a station wagon to some, but to the owners it&#8217;s a one of a kind special automobile. It&#8217;s a shame to see it go, but I&#8217;ll be holding on to mine!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17243</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17243</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;If it&#039;s that worthless, then I should buy one, stash it away for a few years and whala!! I could have a car worth 6 digits. I know that&#039;s overly simplified, but considering what happened to the cars of the &#039;50s and &#039;60s, it could happen. Do you think anyone back in 1965 thought the Mustang fastback could be a fast car. Carroll Shelby called it a secretary&#039;s car. Now look. You can&#039;t touch a 6 cylinder fastback for below 20 grand when just a few years ago they were worthless cars in the hands of college students like me.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If it&#8217;s that worthless, then I should buy one, stash it away for a few years and whala!! I could have a car worth 6 digits. I know that&#8217;s overly simplified, but considering what happened to the cars of the &#8217;50s and &#8217;60s, it could happen. Do you think anyone back in 1965 thought the Mustang fastback could be a fast car. Carroll Shelby called it a secretary&#8217;s car. Now look. You can&#8217;t touch a 6 cylinder fastback for below 20 grand when just a few years ago they were worthless cars in the hands of college students like me.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17244</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17244</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Be honest, this car will be worth 3000.00 in a few months literally, remember the 300m that car is worthless now.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Be honest, this car will be worth 3000.00 in a few months literally, remember the 300m that car is worthless now.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17245</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17245</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;they should cut, cancel, recall, and melt all Pt cruisers... most underpowered vehicle ever made... &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And IMO, the magnum, charger and EVEN the 300C got so heavily bought, it doesn&#039;t impact me at all, they are the 04-08 dodge caravans... just meaningless, unless they pulled a 1950-1960-s era major redesign every two years....  I&#039;d appreciate, just for interest purposes if they cut all those and stockpiled challenger type vehicles with excitement around them.  300C sales have declined BIG TIME since introduction, cause there&#039;s no difference in year other then &quot;adding more chrome&quot; which Chrysler even admits in their ads.....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>they should cut, cancel, recall, and melt all Pt cruisers&#8230; most underpowered vehicle ever made&#8230; </p>
<p>And IMO, the magnum, charger and EVEN the 300C got so heavily bought, it doesn&#8217;t impact me at all, they are the 04-08 dodge caravans&#8230; just meaningless, unless they pulled a 1950-1960-s era major redesign every two years&#8230;.  I&#8217;d appreciate, just for interest purposes if they cut all those and stockpiled challenger type vehicles with excitement around them.  300C sales have declined BIG TIME since introduction, cause there&#8217;s no difference in year other then &#8220;adding more chrome&#8221; which Chrysler even admits in their ads&#8230;..</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17246</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17246</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes the choice seems lame, but this is what happens when a fatally-flawed company faces tough choices, hoping for survival.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m NOT surprised that the PT Cruiser will not have a redesign. That&#039;s been the dilemma all along with that car. What would they change the design to look like? Another old-time boat body? I see it now... the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang Edition PT Cruiser II.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wings, propellers and Aquatic packages optional.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Chitty was one of my favorite movies when I was a kid... still is.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Yes the choice seems lame, but this is what happens when a fatally-flawed company faces tough choices, hoping for survival.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m NOT surprised that the PT Cruiser will not have a redesign. That&#8217;s been the dilemma all along with that car. What would they change the design to look like? Another old-time boat body? I see it now&#8230; the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang Edition PT Cruiser II.</p>
<p>Wings, propellers and Aquatic packages optional.</p>
<p>(Chitty was one of my favorite movies when I was a kid&#8230; still is.)</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17247</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17247</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a shame to see it go. It was truly the first good station wagon since the Ford Falcon wagon. That thing ran hard on the street and looked superb with a surf board in the back. The Beach Boys should write a song about it.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>It&#8217;s a shame to see it go. It was truly the first good station wagon since the Ford Falcon wagon. That thing ran hard on the street and looked superb with a surf board in the back. The Beach Boys should write a song about it.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17248</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17248</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I remember that car, my 90hp subaru gave it a good run. Sorry to see it go, it is so self righteous. I&#039;d rather the masculine subaru 2wd sedan. Kidding aside, giant engines and that body was excellent combo. I like the four doors or wagons for straight race nonchalantly, has been the same for ohhh half a century? the coupes are for suicide, everything else allows you to win. Shame to see it go, appealing to look at. Almost a reason for the big hemi to be open a bit more...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I remember that car, my 90hp subaru gave it a good run. Sorry to see it go, it is so self righteous. I&#8217;d rather the masculine subaru 2wd sedan. Kidding aside, giant engines and that body was excellent combo. I like the four doors or wagons for straight race nonchalantly, has been the same for ohhh half a century? the coupes are for suicide, everything else allows you to win. Shame to see it go, appealing to look at. Almost a reason for the big hemi to be open a bit more&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian VanPelt</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17249</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian VanPelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17249</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I love my PT, but if there was a car I&#039;d swap it for, I&#039;d love to have a Magnum. Personally, I like the lines better than the Charger.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I love my PT, but if there was a car I&#8217;d swap it for, I&#8217;d love to have a Magnum. Personally, I like the lines better than the Charger.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cknarf</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum/comment-page-1/#comment-17250</link>
		<dc:creator>cknarf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/bye-bye-magnum#comment-17250</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;i love the magnum. i&#039;d rather have one of those than a FOUR DOOR charger.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>i love the magnum. i&#8217;d rather have one of those than a FOUR DOOR charger.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

