Toyota A-BAT or GMC Denali XT: Which Would You Choose?

I would take the Dodge Rampage.

theyre both ugly but if i had to choose id go with the gmc
but chances are it wont look anything like that if it does come out
the toyota front end is nasty

3 letters GMC

The GMC all the way! But one guy commented that the GMC probably won’t be produced and if so won’t look a thing like the concept. Which I wouldn’t be suprised. But GMC is a better quality, hell the Toyota dealer where I live has an old Ford truck for a plow truck, lol. But GM should just throw a Denali front end on a Avalanche and call it a day.

neither….i hate the body style of these vehicles. i think it looks extremely ugly

GMC for sure the toyota is way ugly

GMC

As they are now I would definitely go with the GMC. The Toyota looks more like a production vehicle could be closer to that design though. Likely the GMC will look nothing like that in the end.

Gmc with no doubt

Gms with no doubt

GMC all the way!

oh wait,i called the gmc a car,its sad when i can confuse a truck with a car

I’D go with the GMC for sure,granted both are ugly as hell but the gmc is an american car,and i would go with GM or domestics over import trucks any day.Americans should support there own economy,not japans,hell i don’t need my money buying a japanese auto exec another benz or Ferrari.

none of the above

Toyota all the way… GMC looks like a ugly concept car that was put on a lift kit! Toyota has the looks (if you like this type of vehicle, personally I dont), the quality and the reputation. #1 Automaker for a reason people. There is actually a functionality to the ABAT (Advanced Breakthrough Aerodynamic Truck) the Denali is another ordinary GMC hidden behind big rims and alot of chrome.

PS. I am slightly biased since I work for Toyota but above is my story and Im sticking to it.

both are ugly but ill take the toyota quality

denali!!!

the denali looks like the dodge magnum with the ass end cut off an the toyota looks to much like the ridgeline and after thinking about it they are both as ugly as piss ill stick to my omni

You guys are on CRACK! the Toyota is way nicer than the GM.

gmc
-alex

denali, all the way

denali, all the way

the denali. but both are pretty ugly in my opinion.

So then to design automobiles, all you need is a severe crack habbit. Interesting.

Neither one looks good IMO. And, I don’t think either would be a big hit.

the first one had a typo LOL its fixed.

“The DENALI looks like it was made in GOD’s own image”. LOL These words are from brad down at the bottom. WOW you must be religious to say something that IGNORANT. you suggest a CAR, not just a car but an american car is designed after the likes of GOD himself. I hope your vehicle has Really good air conditioning cause your gonna need it in HELL.

“The DENALI looks like it made in GOD’s own image”. LOL These words are from brad down at the bottom. WOW you must be religious to say something that IGNORANT. you suggest a CAR, not just a car but an american car is designed after the likes of GOD himself. I hope your vehicle has Really good air conditioning cause your gonna need it in HELL.

they both most definitly look like butt i wouldnt take either one if they were givin them away for free at the manufacturer

I would have to pick niether, and go buy an escalade EXT.

their both gross the one on the left looks sorta like the honda pickup

They honestly look about the same to me. drawings always change by the time they hit the concept build. and with the same lines, same bed, and damn near the same front end, they’re the same truck. gmc can’t build anything with that low a roof anyway. nobody could wear a hat in the thing.

i like the rims on the GMC but both of them are but ugly

Just thought some people might like to read up on something, enjoy….
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/20/yourmoney/mexcar.php

I guess as long as they can save a few bucks, and only screw over 60k americans within the next few years, why not. I drive a GM…..

back in my day, if you wanted something like these, youd buy an SUV. For all you kids out there I said SUV, not cross-over. Cross-overs don’t exist. Their just station wagons with a fancy name. An SUV is a truck with extra seating instead of a box. Note the word “Truck”. These things arent trucks. They’re glorified cars.

Wow…Ummm… No comment.

the dodge rampage concept

I’d also say both look like they were beaten with the ugly stick too many times but I’d go with the Denali. I like the look of the headlights more. And the ginormous sized rims, doubt they would go into production that way

GMC the A-BAT is down right ugly

GMC the A-BAT is down right ugly

unibody means foriegn in another language. Hey who remembers the camaro and still pretends the body is tough. the silly photo I found with a cow on top of a camaro hood must be a photo chopped, there is really a japanese unibody underneath it.probably an 87 subaru.Photo Chopping would be easy for a fat camaro. I do have a point here…a good unibody does not have one.toyota of course would be my choice for champion.The avalanche looks like one going down the road…too much attempt at one piece by the big fat slobs making it. I said fat slobs. and meant it….

they’re both really, really ugly. The GMC is less ugly than the Toyota, though, so I guess i’d take it.

non of the about

well i am a daimler chrysler man…but i hate asian cars especially honda and toyota, so down to these 2 ill say GMC no questions asked!!! prolly has like 2wice the horsepower and torque!!! DODGE RAM ALL THE WAY!!!

GMC!!!

gmc!!

I said it before that i hate all these unibody trucks….the el camino is awsome as is the new pontiac/holden ute but these should not be used to replace the 1/4 ton offerings like dakota/raider, ranger/b-series, tacoma, canyon/colorado/i-series, frontier, etc. These unibody’s like the ridgeline need to be in a seprate class all there own. And i dont think the ridgeline has good sale numbers anyways, so why are all the automakers turning to them? I’m the proud owner of a 2005 dodge dakot, i love it despite its flaws (small brakes, underpowered engine, weak suspension) but if it’s replaced by a unibody like the dodge rampage concept, I’m going to buy a half-ton, which btw are going to all coil over designs. I miss the old soild axle trucks of yester year. The only true truck concept i’ve seen lately is the Jeep JT, I pray they make that for real, ill be waiting in line.

denali hands down. it looks great.

the toyota probably is a much better built auto though.

I’m sorry but in my opinion they are both ugly as sin.

The Denali from the Only company that knows how to make a perfectly balanced truck G.M.

Denali. Can’t u picture what kind of people would drive each one? I can.

well id go with the toyota cause the low-cut top on the gmc just looks retarded, and the rims kinda trow me off too

Neither. They are both ugly as hell.

Denali, of course. Better BatMan’s pickup than the A-Bat which was beat with the ugly stick… although a lot of the GMC’s looks may be from the oversized rims. The other concept has normal rims on it… what the heck’s the deal with that??????

I’ll take neither and an ‘85 K5 blazer please.

The Denali. That Toyota looks like a rubber ducky with bags under its eyes.

denali xt

I would take the Denali XT.

the denali! the A-Bat looks like a ugly EV on steroids (that has also been beaten with an ugly stick)

the denali! the A-Bat looks like a ugly EV on steroids (that has also been beaten with an ugly stick)

Denali XT. The A-BAT looks as though it were beaten by the ugly stick while the XT looks as though it was made in Gods own image.

Denali XT for sure, the A-BAT is just ugly in comparison.