

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Toyota iQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Kwakovski</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-24030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Kwakovski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq#comment-24030</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;It&#039;s like the big sister of the Smart :D.&lt;br /&gt;
Got some great pics here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carchannel.be/nl/artikel/toyota/toyota-iq-unieke-31-opstelling&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.carchannel.be/nl/artikel/toyota/toyota-iq-unieke-31-opstelling&lt;/a&gt; :D.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>It&#8217;s like the big sister of the Smart <img src='http://blog.cardomain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> .<br />
Got some great pics here: <a href="http://www.carchannel.be/nl/artikel/toyota/toyota-iq-unieke-31-opstelling" rel="nofollow">http://www.carchannel.be/nl/artikel/toyota/toyota-iq-unieke-31-opstelling</a> <img src='http://blog.cardomain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kap0w</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-24031</link>
		<dc:creator>kap0w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq#comment-24031</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Wow... they brought back the xA minus the rear seats.  I like it and I&#039;m really glad to see more competitors in Smart&#039;s space.  Nothing against smart, but choices are good!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wow&#8230; they brought back the xA minus the rear seats.  I like it and I&#8217;m really glad to see more competitors in Smart&#8217;s space.  Nothing against smart, but choices are good!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-24032</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq#comment-24032</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;d rather have an IQ over a Smart anyday. But, I agree with RetroMan... Toyota should have done a little bit better of a job naming it.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;d rather have an IQ over a Smart anyday. But, I agree with RetroMan&#8230; Toyota should have done a little bit better of a job naming it.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-24033</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq#comment-24033</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;whats the difference between iq and the aygo???&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>whats the difference between iq and the aygo???</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-24034</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/2009-toyota-iq#comment-24034</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The production certainly looks better than the concept, which is quite rare in the design process of most cars. What&#039;s with the names like Smart and IQ though? Nothin&#039; against em, I just thought Toyota would be a little more creative than to knock off Chrysler.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The production certainly looks better than the concept, which is quite rare in the design process of most cars. What&#8217;s with the names like Smart and IQ though? Nothin&#8217; against em, I just thought Toyota would be a little more creative than to knock off Chrysler.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

