<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Taurus X &#8211; A Guilty Pleasure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/22/ford-taurus-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/22/ford-taurus-x/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Automotive news &#38; crazy member rides from the CarDomain Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:07:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Truesdell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/22/ford-taurus-x/#comment-39106</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Truesdell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/22/ford-taurus-x#comment-39106</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Alex, do I know you? Unfortunately, from what I&#039;ve been able to gather from a forum over on blueovalnews.com (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blueovalforums.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21469&amp;st=0)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.blueovalforums.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21469&amp;st=0)&lt;/a&gt; the Taurus X will not be part of the accelerated revamping of the Taurus lineup. That, plus the overlap with the upcoming Ford Flex would seem to insure that 2009, 2010 at the latest, that the Taurus X will be with us. So I don&#039;t think that doing a Taurus X project vehicle makes much sense. I will have more comments on this subject over on Automotive Traveler (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.automotivetraveler.com)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.automotivetraveler.com)&lt;/a&gt; on Monday. This will appear either on the home page or my &quot;rear view mirror&quot; blog. I invite you to take a look later on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, do I know you? Unfortunately, from what I&#8217;ve been able to gather from a forum over on blueovalnews.com (<a href="http://www.blueovalforums.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21469&#038;st=0)" rel="nofollow">http://www.blueovalforums.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21469&#038;st=0)</a> the Taurus X will not be part of the accelerated revamping of the Taurus lineup. That, plus the overlap with the upcoming Ford Flex would seem to insure that 2009, 2010 at the latest, that the Taurus X will be with us. So I don&#8217;t think that doing a Taurus X project vehicle makes much sense. I will have more comments on this subject over on Automotive Traveler (<a href="http://www.automotivetraveler.com)" rel="nofollow">http://www.automotivetraveler.com)</a> on Monday. This will appear either on the home page or my &#8220;rear view mirror&#8221; blog. I invite you to take a look later on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atomicalex</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/02/22/ford-taurus-x/#comment-39110</link>
		<dc:creator>atomicalex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/02/22/ford-taurus-x#comment-39110</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;My dear, we are in the minority. I do not thing woody panels are a good idea. Yet. I think that needs another three or four years to grow on the public. Once we see some tricked out, slammed down, and hopped up wagons start showing up at SEMA on a regular basis, the wagon will return to its former place at the top of the automotive heap. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, you wanna do a project together?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>My dear, we are in the minority. I do not thing woody panels are a good idea. Yet. I think that needs another three or four years to grow on the public. Once we see some tricked out, slammed down, and hopped up wagons start showing up at SEMA on a regular basis, the wagon will return to its former place at the top of the automotive heap. </p>
<p>So, you wanna do a project together?</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
