Comments on: Base Camaro Convertible Photos http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con/ CarDomain Blog - Automotive news & crazy member rides from the CarDomain Community Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:29:59 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: chevy343 http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con/#comment-35100 chevy343 Wed, 07 May 2008 22:12:54 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con#comment-35100 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I love how soo many people are talking shit about it.<br /> Who cars if it dosent have some amazing hood or whatever?<br /> there were Camaros whoo v6's and inline 6's that were just for the working man that wanted to say he had a Camaro.<br /> I personaly think this is prettier than some huge wheeld matchbox car.<br /> Id want a hard top though.</p> </div>

I love how soo many people are talking shit about it.
Who cars if it dosent have some amazing hood or whatever?
there were Camaros whoo v6’s and inline 6’s that were just for the working man that wanted to say he had a Camaro.
I personaly think this is prettier than some huge wheeld matchbox car.
Id want a hard top though.

]]> By: Tyler http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con/#comment-35102 Tyler Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:12:16 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con#comment-35102 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>the thing that makes it not look so mean, the front slit is gone, the brake ducts dont look functional, the mirrors are a legal size, and the wheels (thank god) look normal sized</p> </div>

the thing that makes it not look so mean, the front slit is gone, the brake ducts dont look functional, the mirrors are a legal size, and the wheels (thank god) look normal sized

]]> By: Tony Rowe http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con/#comment-35106 Tony Rowe Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:13:50 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con#comment-35106 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I liked the concept car..... It had bite!<br /> This car here looks like an old dog that's had it's teeth removed..... <br /> Something was lost in the transition from concept to production that really made this car a "stand out" from all the other retro looking cars out today. </p> <p>I'm sure you'll still sell a ton of them...</p></div>

I liked the concept car….. It had bite!
This car here looks like an old dog that’s had it’s teeth removed…..
Something was lost in the transition from concept to production that really made this car a “stand out” from all the other retro looking cars out today.

I’m sure you’ll still sell a ton of them…

]]> By: Tyler http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con/#comment-35109 Tyler Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:39:30 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con#comment-35109 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>WHERES THE FRONT INTAKE CUTOUT IN FRONT OF THE HOOD!?!?!?!?!</p> </div>

WHERES THE FRONT INTAKE CUTOUT IN FRONT OF THE HOOD!?!?!?!?!

]]> By: Tony http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con/#comment-35115 Tony Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:40:21 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con#comment-35115 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I was under the impression the V6 version would have single exhausts, not duals as this version does. Does anyone know if the V6 will have dual exhaust tips? Either way, she looks awesome without a top.</p> </div>

I was under the impression the V6 version would have single exhausts, not duals as this version does. Does anyone know if the V6 will have dual exhaust tips? Either way, she looks awesome without a top.

]]> By: GTR http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con/#comment-35120 GTR Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:18:16 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/base-camaro-con#comment-35120 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I think thats the V6 version, but damn it still looks phat.</p> </div>

I think thats the V6 version, but damn it still looks phat.

]]>