« Everything’s Bigger In… Moscow?  CarDomain Blog Home  Engine Refresh How-To: First, Research and Documentation »

March 31, 2008

California Targets pre-’76 Cars for Pollution

By Jen Dunnaway

Editor

Frankly, we can’t exactly blame California for having some of the strictest emissions laws in the country—when your major cities are that obscenely overpopulated, you kind of have to. But now, the Golden State is going after cars built prior to 1976, which have historically been exempt from its strict emissions testing, largely because these cars didn’t yet have much in the way of modern emission-control equipment—it wouldn’t make any sense to test them using today’s standards. Polluters though they might be, here’s why even these antiquated hulks don’t spew out as much smog as a modern commuter car: they represent only a tiny sliver of the automotive population, and they’re almost never daily drivers—how many people do you know who drive a ‘59 Cadillac to work, anyway? We’re talking about cars that are more than three decades old, that are largely gas-guzzling V8s, and are likely as not to have personality tics, such as a low tolerance for idling in traffic for extended periods. In other words, no one in their right mind would use them for everyday driving; these are the pampered rides that are saved for car shows and sunny-day cruisin’, and over the course of a year they probably put out less total C02 than a Corolla. The proposed legislation, which would impose emissions tests that pre-’76 cars would be unable to pass, simply amounts to another way to persecute enthusiasts over their infrequently-driven hobby cars. And the Hot Rod Blog makes the point that legislation that first gains traction in California rarely stays in California—you don’t need to look much further back than the national smoking ban to prove that.

Of course this is by no means the first time that Cali has pushed car-unfriendly legislation, and lawmakers probably think that the current climate of anxiety about gas prices and pollution will make the public more prone to scapegoating older cars. Wanna prove ‘em wrong? Express your opposition to S.B. 1549 to the California Senate Transportation and Housing Committee through the SEMA site.

Chrysler Cordoba, Cali's New Scapegoat

Via TTAC

Comments

Flash
Apr 10, 2008 at 1:34 pm

I am glad to live in a state where there is still snow on the ground TODAY – where there is salted roads and 2005 model cars with rusted out floorboards…because I am NOT in Kalifornia!!

GTwildfire
Apr 3, 2008 at 2:17 am

For aslong as I can remember, I had no interest in living where the earth moves, but the people don’t.
-
As time goes on more reasons not to ever consider moving there have surfaced.
-
It has become the place where the people think, but the legislators dont.
-
I, too amd glad to live in PA, where there are few tornados, hurricanes or huge forrest fires, it’s seismically pretty inactive, there are no scorpions or tarantulas, few if any wild rattlesnakes, no wolves or gators or grizzlies and you can drive a car of any age or type without retaliation from those who should be serving you in office.

i_luv_dusty
Apr 1, 2008 at 5:13 pm

Yet another reason why you couldn’t pay me to live in Kalifornia.
.
This is what happens when bureaucrats think they are knowledgeable about something other than politics.

Evan
Apr 1, 2008 at 1:44 pm

Arnold’s Last stand before he retires as Governor!
“I will terminate all old kars ruuuinning the environment, aargggh”

D
Apr 1, 2008 at 12:53 pm

California just doesn’t seem like a very nice to live if you ask me, they are always trying to take away our guns(any and all kinds) which takes away our right to defend our selfs, and now our right drive cool cars that our fathers & and grandfathers once drove or dreamed of, and I’ll bet its all about those fucking giant condors, it always is (I’ve always wondered what is so special about them).
But I digress, I’m glad I live in PA.

Jeremy
Apr 1, 2008 at 2:33 am

politicians are just trying to make it look like they’re doing something and give a shit about the issues they based their campaigns on.

sorry, had to get that out.

Stewart
Apr 1, 2008 at 1:22 am

Kommiefornia Smog Nazis :(

GTwildfire
Apr 1, 2008 at 12:41 am

Common sense dictates that there are extremely few pre-’76 cars on the roads in regular use. I bet if they were in regular use that might represent one percent or less of the cars on the roads, most likely less.
-
If you then look at the sum of those cars, a majority are collector or show cars, then you have some that are very occasionally used (why they’re still in existence, most likely) and when you boil it down maybe 1 in 5 don’t fit into those subcategories.
-
I giess it’s a very complicated way to deduce that California Legislators are goddam MORONS.