

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring Back the LX Notch!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29669</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2#comment-29669</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m a GM guy.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I love the new Mustangs,&lt;br /&gt;
and when I was a teenager, the California &lt;br /&gt;
Highway Patrol had those notch back Mustangs.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
I didn&#039;t like them, because they were a threat ;)&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly think it was the best of the Fox bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
Stiffer and lighter than the GT hatchback.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
You didn&#039;t have to buy the all the GT bodywork, and&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;boy racer&quot; stuff.  &lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
I liked the sleeper look of the notch.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;d consider buying one if they made them again.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
On a side note, my girlfriend (now my wife) had a 1964 1/2 Mustang when I met her....&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
For those who have forgotten, those were notch backs...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;m a GM guy.<br />
.<br />
That said, I love the new Mustangs,<br />
and when I was a teenager, the California <br />
Highway Patrol had those notch back Mustangs.<br />
.<br />
I didn&#8217;t like them, because they were a threat <img src='http://blog.cardomain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
.<br />
I honestly think it was the best of the Fox bodies.<br />
.<br />
Stiffer and lighter than the GT hatchback.<br />
.<br />
You didn&#8217;t have to buy the all the GT bodywork, and<br />
&#8220;boy racer&#8221; stuff.  <br />
.<br />
I liked the sleeper look of the notch.<br />
.<br />
I&#8217;d consider buying one if they made them again.<br />
.<br />
On a side note, my girlfriend (now my wife) had a 1964 1/2 Mustang when I met her&#8230;.<br />
.<br />
For those who have forgotten, those were notch backs&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29670</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 05:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2#comment-29670</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been wondering for quite a while why they stopped the coupe in 94 and haven&#039;t made another one since.  I see the fox bodies all over the place with notches, most of the 60&#039;s Stangs were notches, seems like it would be a good idea to bring it back.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering for quite a while why they stopped the coupe in 94 and haven&#8217;t made another one since.  I see the fox bodies all over the place with notches, most of the 60&#8242;s Stangs were notches, seems like it would be a good idea to bring it back.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elcamino-dude</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29671</link>
		<dc:creator>elcamino-dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 03:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2#comment-29671</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;That would be sweet to see new mustang notch backs, i like the hatchback ones but damn, for this body style nothign beats the sweet notchback&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>That would be sweet to see new mustang notch backs, i like the hatchback ones but damn, for this body style nothign beats the sweet notchback</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29672</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2#comment-29672</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;More notches were made than anything else. Yeah, they might be unclassy, but its guaranteed you can still find a notch under 5g. Ford&#039;s philosophy for the Stang has always been &quot;Show the 8, sell the 6&quot;. In other words, if it wasnt for all those bare base models, we wouldn&#039;t have good looking true performance Stangs. Aside from that, I always thought the notch looked sick in police badging. Your welcome to your own opinion though. This is just my $.02&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>More notches were made than anything else. Yeah, they might be unclassy, but its guaranteed you can still find a notch under 5g. Ford&#8217;s philosophy for the Stang has always been &#8220;Show the 8, sell the 6&#8243;. In other words, if it wasnt for all those bare base models, we wouldn&#8217;t have good looking true performance Stangs. Aside from that, I always thought the notch looked sick in police badging. Your welcome to your own opinion though. This is just my $.02</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29673</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2#comment-29673</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;But they should not bring back this mustang, there&#039;s a reason they dont have a notchback anymore! But for those who preferre a little more consider a 550 maranello (ferrari) something with some class to get the ass!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>But they should not bring back this mustang, there&#8217;s a reason they dont have a notchback anymore! But for those who preferre a little more consider a 550 maranello (ferrari) something with some class to get the ass!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29674</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2#comment-29674</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I second that Eric, but if they do, they&#039;d better have an R/T model!!! For those of you who still don&#039;t know what a Spirit R/T is or how fast it was, just click my link.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I second that Eric, but if they do, they&#8217;d better have an R/T model!!! For those of you who still don&#8217;t know what a Spirit R/T is or how fast it was, just click my link.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29675</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2#comment-29675</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;They should bring back the dodge spirit.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>They should bring back the dodge spirit.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29676</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/bring-back-the-2#comment-29676</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s see, the notch left us in &#039;93. By comparison, there was no &#039;vert from &#039;73-&#039;83. Yep, sounds like we&#039;re overdue to me!!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Let&#8217;s see, the notch left us in &#8217;93. By comparison, there was no &#8216;vert from &#8217;73-&#8217;83. Yep, sounds like we&#8217;re overdue to me!!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

