Comments on: Poor XJ6 Pleads for Sweet Embrace of the Crusher http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/ CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: 7urtle http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/comment-page-1/#comment-30234 7urtle Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:48:19 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads#comment-30234 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>its ugly. it shouldnt have the steps on the side. it should be all smooth side panel and bed is too high. then might loook good</p> </div>

its ugly. it shouldnt have the steps on the side. it should be all smooth side panel and bed is too high. then might loook good

]]> By: 7urtle http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/comment-page-1/#comment-30235 7urtle Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:48:11 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads#comment-30235 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>its ugly. it shouldnt have the steps on the side. it should be all smooth side panel and bed is too high. then might loook good</p> </div>

its ugly. it shouldnt have the steps on the side. it should be all smooth side panel and bed is too high. then might loook good

]]> By: Josh http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/comment-page-1/#comment-30236 Josh Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:14:59 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads#comment-30236 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I think it'd look a little better if they shaved a few inches off of the top of the bed. It's too high for the car.</p> </div>

I think it’d look a little better if they shaved a few inches off of the top of the bed. It’s too high for the car.

]]> By: Cknarf http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/comment-page-1/#comment-30237 Cknarf Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:40:24 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads#comment-30237 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Ugly? it's freakin' awesome!</p> </div>

Ugly? it’s freakin’ awesome!

]]> By: GTwildfire http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/comment-page-1/#comment-30238 GTwildfire Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:05:03 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads#comment-30238 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>This is great! I love it.<br /> -<br /> From the rear, you would have NO IDEA what the front looks like.</p> </div>

This is great! I love it.
-
From the rear, you would have NO IDEA what the front looks like.

]]> By: Jake http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/comment-page-1/#comment-30239 Jake Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:35:14 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads#comment-30239 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Neat.</p> </div>

Neat.

]]> By: Stewart http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/comment-page-1/#comment-30240 Stewart Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:54:27 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads#comment-30240 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I don't know what to say.<br /> .<br /> If I can't say anything nice, well....<br /> .<br /> .<br /> .<br /> .</p> </div>

I don’t know what to say.
.
If I can’t say anything nice, well….
.
.
.
.

]]> By: retroman http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads/comment-page-1/#comment-30241 retroman Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:35:28 +0000 http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/poor-xj6-pleads#comment-30241 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Hmmm... a luxo performance ute. Haven't seen one in that category. Kinda nice, but does it justify Sawzawing a Jag?</p> </div>

Hmmm… a luxo performance ute. Haven’t seen one in that category. Kinda nice, but does it justify Sawzawing a Jag?

]]>