

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viva Las Vegas: Straight Six Shootout!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/13/viva-las-vega-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/13/viva-las-vega-7/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kap0w</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/13/viva-las-vega-7/comment-page-1/#comment-30688</link>
		<dc:creator>kap0w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/viva-las-vega-7#comment-30688</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I love the ingenuity that goes into these builds.  There is something to be said for restoring a car back to the way it was the day it was built, but you can use a lot more creativity when you can combine any parts you want!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I love the ingenuity that goes into these builds.  There is something to be said for restoring a car back to the way it was the day it was built, but you can use a lot more creativity when you can combine any parts you want!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/13/viva-las-vega-7/comment-page-1/#comment-30689</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/viva-las-vega-7#comment-30689</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Jen-&lt;br /&gt;
FYI, the 1962 Chevy II/Nova never had the 235. Just the 194; the 235 was still available in full-size Chevrolets that year, however.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Jen-<br />
FYI, the 1962 Chevy II/Nova never had the 235. Just the 194; the 235 was still available in full-size Chevrolets that year, however.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/04/13/viva-las-vega-7/comment-page-1/#comment-30690</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/viva-las-vega-7#comment-30690</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m with you on that one. I love to see the V8s and all, but it&#039;s nice to see something different for a change. I bet that there are more V8 Mustangs running around now than what Ford has record of building, so I kinda tend to pay more attention to an unrestored Stang still bearing an I6 just cause even though Ford made millions of those, you hardly see them at the shows.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;m with you on that one. I love to see the V8s and all, but it&#8217;s nice to see something different for a change. I bet that there are more V8 Mustangs running around now than what Ford has record of building, so I kinda tend to pay more attention to an unrestored Stang still bearing an I6 just cause even though Ford made millions of those, you hardly see them at the shows.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

