caddillac f course, all audi`s are boring and ugly ones.

I’d have to agree with Ryan on the interior – see for yourself… check the compare photos at autos.msn.com between the 2008 RS4 and 2008 CTS, the CTS is the clear winner if you ask me… besides, all that extra horsepower on a car that was already neck and neck with the RS4 when it only had 400? No question if you ask me. CTS.

I’ve ridden in new A4s and the new CTS and I don’t understand those who say that the Audi has a nicer interior… unless they’re sipping some kool-aid. Not only is the switchgear in the Caddy at least as good, the design is lightyears ahead of the early 2000s (and conservative then) interior of the Audi. I LOVE Audi’s but the sedan A4 platform is hardly anybody’s benchmark anymore (accept maybe for the AWD). Finally, I wouldn’t be so quick to write off the track performance of the CTS – AWD is never and automatic. I’d bet that the Audi is easier to drive on the track, but a skilled driver would run circles around the RS4. And don’t get me started on reliability. CTS-V for me.

I’d take the Audi. It might be slower and more expensive, but it’s got the security of AWD, and a far nicer, higher quality interior than GM could ever manage to put into the CTS. Also, I prefer the Audi’s more low key looks – the CTS-V is just a little bit too showy, vulgar and “new money” for my liking.

Btw, this isn’t a remotely fair match-up – 414bhp 4.2V8 vs 550bhp 6.2V8 has the numbers stacked waaaaaaaaay in the Caddy’s favour. Try pitting the 550bhp CTS-V against the 573bhp Audi RS6 on a track and see which is victorious – the Audi, no shadow of a doubt.

Who cares, have fun or take the bus, Speed = Ticket ! = fact.
If caught will = accident = maybe death= foolish, Slow down Maybe gas prices will go down.

Who cares, have fun or take the bus, Speed = Ticket ! = fact.
If caught will = accident = maybe death= foolish Slow down Maybe gap prices will go down.

Audi is the better car of the two. Just the fact that Caddy BENCHMARKED their car on German designs speaks volumes…Germans innovate, Japanese/Domestic imitate.

Having owned an SVT COBRA, and wanting the domestics to do what they do in a new way, and now owning a Cayman, I find the CTS-V on my radar, not so much for what it can’t do, but for what it represents. The audi interior has been a strong point for a decade, but I still need that RWD thrill to make the day to day burn interesting. If I want total confidence, I would ride the bus. Oh, wait, to work in town, I do.

The Audi all the way Cadillac sucks and wish they built nice cars. German engineering that can go 400,000 kms(250,000 miles) when an American car can do pull this off with every single car then I might consider a GM or Chevy but until then imports forever!

Please watch this video of a apples to apples comparison although it is not the 2009 CTS-V

http://www.gtchannel.com/content.php?cid=4549