« Some Background on the Tuner Scooter Scene CarDomain Blog Home Jay Leno Drives the Tesla »
May 16, 2008
This Is Why We Sucked: Car and Driver Does a Bunch of Crying About Skyline GT-R's One Lap Performance
By Jen Dunnaway
Editor
Tony Swan of Car and Driver, who ran the Nissan GT-R in this year’s One Lap of America, has apparently gotten a lot of static about finishing "only" 11th in the overall standings and feels understandably prevailed upon to justify the much-hyped supercar’s performance. But oddly, the article that appears for this purpose on the Car and Driver website mostly just comes across as a load of whiny diapers. Though he blames everything from tires to computer technology, much of the apologia centers on the "fateful" autocross challenge at BeaveRun, where Tony got confused and went off course, resulting in a DNF and a minor tantrum by the driver, who reportedly stormed off in a huff, gunning the GT-R through a paddock populated by spectators. Probably not his proudest moment, but in the ensuing drama, it nonetheless became the spearhead for a movement to award a bunch of "bonus points" to those who failed to negotiate the autocross course successfully. Fortunately, common sense eventually prevailed, with the organizers confirming that a DNF is a DNF and that it wasn’t in the spirit of the event to compensate teams for poor performance. Seems perfectly reasonable, though Tony apparently has a different sense of how it all went down. It’s clear that he’s endeavoring to be candid and honest about what happened, but having a GT-R fall on its face in multiple events turns out to be not the easiest thing to explain away. Read Tony’s article here to decide for yourself if he gives a satisfactory defense of the GT-R’s finish.
Comments
Post a comment
Please login to CarDomain to post a comment.

0
0



Anonymous
Jun 2, 2008 at 8:50 pm
WHATS UP WITH THE BABY YOU KREEP
PeteY (LandofMinos)
May 19, 2008 at 12:37 am
I bought a Car & Driver magazine last week. In Sydney Australia…
I can’t believe I paid AU$8.95 for that piece of crap. Really if that magazine in distributed monthly around the US. Why does it only have half the content of any Aussie or UK equivalent magazine? The articles were quite clinical yet felt incomplete like the rest of the magazine. They were also lacking in humour, took itself too seriously.
Very slack production indeed. Maybe I’m being a bit pre-judgemental, maybe it was a slow news month, I’ve only ever seen the one issue.
Crash
May 18, 2008 at 3:27 am
I also used to like C&D back in the 80s and 90s. Now it’s more like ‘Car and Crotchety Old Driver’
Mike/Liverpool
May 18, 2008 at 12:01 am
I liked the fact that he was up front about his short comings, i was taken back by how he says the tyres can’t handle standing water. Sure Bridgestone has that rep here in the UK & yes Dunlops will be offered…………..but i seen footage on You tube of GTR being driven HARD in standing water………….looked ok to me.
Mike/Liverpool Uk
aint buying it
May 17, 2008 at 7:05 pm
first off the GTR is a sweet execution,Nissan needs to be commended for a job well done…their latest version is a new classic.
the DRIVER involved here,was a total screw up….
if I had the means….definately GTR versus VETTE…
Tony,you need a bit more driving school time,you SUCK!!!!
and I am also not renewing my Car and Driver subscription either.
it has slipped bigtime,and I’m not interested in fueling writers, who cant drive consistantly and BLAME THE CAR
gtwildfire
May 17, 2008 at 2:46 am
Hey, even the Stig has screwed up. Fortunately he dosen’t talk or it would have diminished his mystique, that is if he approached the subject as swan has.
-
I’ve read that race car drivers may blame the car, circumstances, track conditions because admitting their own fault would cause a lack of confidence in themselves.
-
Personally I think that’s bullshit, or at least should be. “Experience” is having screwed up and learned from it at least partly to gain proficiency and status but it does NOT grant immunity from making mistakes.
-
His worst mistake, fortunately was not admitting his mistakes, and not having injured or killed someone.
Anonymous
May 17, 2008 at 1:58 am
Don’t worry, its the car.
ACR is number 1 track car.
10/12 roadcourse 1st finishes evidence enough?
And it would have gottne 1st overall in One Lap if the skidpad wasn’t so heavily weighted.
J
May 16, 2008 at 10:50 pm
Tony is just being perceptive. He realizes that his own failure will lead to hesitation by manufacturers in the future to loan out cutting-edge cars and risk having their baby appear substandard as a result of a driving gaffe by a journalist- this just cost Nissan a BUNCH of marketing hype, right or wrong.
Tony is a bright boy- he knew right away that he’ll always be known as “that guy” in the future, and it’s back to getting first-run editions of Cavaliers again………
“Federly! Fries!”
Hehehehh.
CSX321
May 16, 2008 at 9:49 pm
Is this the same guy who got thrown out of Road America during the 2006 One Lap for doing donuts on their freshly laid parking lot asphalt, after everyone was told to stay off of it?
Used to Like C+D
May 16, 2008 at 9:02 pm
I used to love Car and Driver during the 80s and early 90s, but their hyper-consumer anti-environmental rants have really soured me on the magazine and it’s editorial bent. This sort of thing just reinforces my annoyance with what was once the best car magazine out there.
That, and they don’t bother testing many cars that actual people use, instead preferring to devote 90% of their cages to vehicles 1/10 of 1% of drivers will ever pilot.
Ian
May 16, 2008 at 8:55 pm
What a bunch of whiney Susans. You sucked at the track, just say so. We all have days like that, but to storm off in an unfamiliar, loaned car and put everyone in danger because your man-pon got stuck is just ridiculous. I’m glad I’m cancelling my subscription. This magazine has been a sub-par publication at best, loaded with a bunch of pompus old men hoping the hay days of 1960s muscle cars would make a comeback. They should call themselves “Car and Non-driver.”
“Road and Track” and “Automobile” magazines for me, from now on.
Barry Winfield
May 16, 2008 at 8:31 pm
Tony can take a joke, but I note that there were 24 competitors that could not find the second autocross section. Tony has raced his whole life, and is a perfectly competent driver. Launch controls, I’ve found, can be temperamental. Perhaps Tony and the other 24 competitors should get a compass award rather than the crying baby one.
Infosaur
May 16, 2008 at 8:10 pm
Hmmm looks like the GT-R just needs an adjustment to the “nut behind the wheel”. That usually fixes 95% of the problems.
Arun S
May 16, 2008 at 7:44 pm
GTR is an awesome car, one of the best for it’s performance vs money balance, and I am immensely happy with Nissan for bringing it out. Let me stop here.
vaderwasframed
May 16, 2008 at 6:55 pm
I commend Tony, for his honesty and response. I have seen some of the trashing that he has taken, and he is a professional. If he says that Launch control sucks on a rolling start, I can deal with that. And anyone who autocrosses at different tracks can tell you, nothing is as easy as it looks. Raptorattack has some harsh words above, but Its probably idiots like him that still think its cool to drive a supped up Civics with garbage can exhaust systems, that is in reality, just an exhaust system….and not truly suped up.
bravenrace
May 16, 2008 at 6:30 pm
It sounded to me to be mostly very objective. He pointed out the stong and weak points of the car and himself. How is that whining?
I definitely don’t agree with driving recklessly through the pits (if he in fact did that), but I find nothing at all wrong with his article. Whining? No. Explaining? Yes.
BTW, for those here that don’t seem to know it, Tony Swan is a very accomplished sports car racing driver. In fact, Pat Bedard is also an accomplished racer.
bmwd00d
May 16, 2008 at 6:23 pm
They should’ve let The Stig be the driver
I don’t think people should draw conclusions about the car based on the outcome of this…
Dave T.
May 16, 2008 at 6:00 pm
well I’m half on half here.
1. Autocross for these kinds of cars sounds stupid to me.
2. As an auto journalist myself I readily admit I’m not a professional driver. To take on these tracks you have to have skills. I’ve only been on road america and I doubt I would have finished near the top no matter what car I was in if semi-pro drivers were in the other cars.
3. Driving recklessly with pedestrians around is stupid with no excuses.
Highspeedhijinks
May 16, 2008 at 2:25 pm
This is why I hate car and driver. They know a lot about cars, but not a one of them is a Driver. They’ll rattle off technical specs like its the only thing that matters. There mag is garbage.
~
I read Motor Trend because they’ll give you the specs on a spec page but the article is about how the car Drives, Feels, and Emotions of driving it. If a Hyundia Sonata gets them excited, they’ll tell you that its an exciting car.
~
I feel bad that the GT-R is getting bad press allready. Put a real driver in there and try again next year boys.
Tony
May 16, 2008 at 7:42 am
Full of excuses. As GT said, it’s not the car, its the driver.
Anonymous
May 16, 2008 at 3:57 am
haha nice blog Jen! Tony just needs to learn how to autocross!
Mothra
GTwildfire
May 16, 2008 at 2:33 am
It’s not the car, it’s the driver. People forget that cliche has two edges and with prestige comes excuses.
-
Nonetheless, the car only does what its driver wants it to do. The car wasn’t intent on going through a paddock of spectators after running off course, of course.
-
Real men admit when they screwed up.
raptorattack
May 16, 2008 at 2:06 am
why does this idiot work for a car magazine if he really was a big enough dick to go racing through the pits they should fire him he should go work for pampers monthly