

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: K-car with a Continental Kit!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fireball22</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39177</link>
		<dc:creator>Fireball22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39177</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;We know it&#039;s not factory, but that doesn&#039;t mean that someone in the aftermarket should have even attempted this to begin with, either. Like the fake wood paneling wasn&#039;t triggering the gag reflex enough on its own...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, had the Conty kit been mounted on the front of the Le Baron, they would&#039;ve had the claim of offering slightly improved crash protection...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>We know it&#8217;s not factory, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that someone in the aftermarket should have even attempted this to begin with, either. Like the fake wood paneling wasn&#8217;t triggering the gag reflex enough on its own&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, had the Conty kit been mounted on the front of the Le Baron, they would&#8217;ve had the claim of offering slightly improved crash protection&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShelbyDodgeImp</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39178</link>
		<dc:creator>ShelbyDodgeImp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No way is this factory. I know these cars and their stock configurations very well and know from personal experience that back in the 80s-early 90s many dealers (and not just Mopar dealers) took it upon themselves to add &quot;dealer options&quot; using odd parts available on the after market scene.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You see, way back then it was stylish to go and cover your luxury car (caddys, lincolns, even some of the larger kcars) in gold grills, continental kits, window tint, vynil roofs with ribs under them to look like a soft top convert, etc and these were very profitable to the dealers who would charge a premium for them to people thinking they were getting factory cars.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The after market company most Mopar dealers used for odd bolt ons like this (excluding vynil roofs which were usually done by local body shops) was C&amp;C Customs, who made continental kits that I&#039;ve seen as dealer options on Fords, GMs and Mopars during this era. They even made a gold plated grill for the Dodge Dynasty (every so often one appears on eBay). The continental kits were all basically a nonfunctional plastic &quot;tub&quot; that sat on the rear of your car. This hub was not functional (could not store a tire, not even a donate spare) and was just for looks. It had a lever-spring system so that you could push it down for easier access to the trunk and trunk lock.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These can go for big $$ today on eBay because a lot of people in the low rider community use the same kits on their cars today. Note that the kit did not include the 50s style bumper extension seen on this car- so I am guessing the dealer had a body shop (or maybe talented employee?) build one from scratch (??).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you go further back, into the 70s, you could get a lot of nonfunctional add ons like this for American luxury cars, including big tubs that you&#039;d mold onto your body to make it look like your front fenders are carrying spares (1920&#039;s style). I saw one Lincoln done up like this that had three of those &quot;tubs&quot; on their car- one on each front fender and one on the rear trunklid, but unlike the fake continental kit of the 80s these were more life-size. BTW the trunklid of some past Chrysler Imperials looked like it held a spare tire for cosmetic appeal, and that was back in the what, 60s? But that one was stock.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way is this factory. I know these cars and their stock configurations very well and know from personal experience that back in the 80s-early 90s many dealers (and not just Mopar dealers) took it upon themselves to add &#8220;dealer options&#8221; using odd parts available on the after market scene.</p>
<p>You see, way back then it was stylish to go and cover your luxury car (caddys, lincolns, even some of the larger kcars) in gold grills, continental kits, window tint, vynil roofs with ribs under them to look like a soft top convert, etc and these were very profitable to the dealers who would charge a premium for them to people thinking they were getting factory cars.</p>
<p>The after market company most Mopar dealers used for odd bolt ons like this (excluding vynil roofs which were usually done by local body shops) was C&#038;C Customs, who made continental kits that I&#8217;ve seen as dealer options on Fords, GMs and Mopars during this era. They even made a gold plated grill for the Dodge Dynasty (every so often one appears on eBay). The continental kits were all basically a nonfunctional plastic &#8220;tub&#8221; that sat on the rear of your car. This hub was not functional (could not store a tire, not even a donate spare) and was just for looks. It had a lever-spring system so that you could push it down for easier access to the trunk and trunk lock.</p>
<p>These can go for big $$ today on eBay because a lot of people in the low rider community use the same kits on their cars today. Note that the kit did not include the 50s style bumper extension seen on this car- so I am guessing the dealer had a body shop (or maybe talented employee?) build one from scratch (??).</p>
<p>If you go further back, into the 70s, you could get a lot of nonfunctional add ons like this for American luxury cars, including big tubs that you&#8217;d mold onto your body to make it look like your front fenders are carrying spares (1920&#8242;s style). I saw one Lincoln done up like this that had three of those &#8220;tubs&#8221; on their car- one on each front fender and one on the rear trunklid, but unlike the fake continental kit of the 80s these were more life-size. BTW the trunklid of some past Chrysler Imperials looked like it held a spare tire for cosmetic appeal, and that was back in the what, 60s? But that one was stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39179</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39179</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Taste like this, money can&#039;t buy... or at least it shouldn&#039;t be able to!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Taste like this, money can&#8217;t buy&#8230; or at least it shouldn&#8217;t be able to!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39180</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39180</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;This thing is so ugly...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
That it is almost cool.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously, I would love to own it, and&lt;br /&gt;
pick up my kids at High School in it...&lt;br /&gt;
It would be funny as hell, for me anyway ;)&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I&#039;d like to see this on Power Tour...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
That would raise eyebrows a bit...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
What a funny looking car...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
The sad thing is that someone actually thought it&lt;br /&gt;
would be a good idea to build this...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>This thing is so ugly&#8230;<br />
.<br />
That it is almost cool.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
Seriously, I would love to own it, and<br />
pick up my kids at High School in it&#8230;<br />
It would be funny as hell, for me anyway <img src='http://blog.cardomain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
.<br />
.<br />
Also, I&#8217;d like to see this on Power Tour&#8230;<br />
.<br />
That would raise eyebrows a bit&#8230;<br />
.<br />
.<br />
What a funny looking car&#8230;<br />
.<br />
The sad thing is that someone actually thought it<br />
would be a good idea to build this&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39181</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39181</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;This thing is so ugly...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
That it is almost cool.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously, I would love to own it, and&lt;br /&gt;
pick up my kids at High School in it...&lt;br /&gt;
It would be funny as hell, for me anyway ;)&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I&#039;d like to see this on Power Tour...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
That would raise eyebrows a bit...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
What a funny looking car...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
The sad thing is that someone actually thought it&lt;br /&gt;
would be a good idea to build this...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>This thing is so ugly&#8230;<br />
.<br />
That it is almost cool.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
Seriously, I would love to own it, and<br />
pick up my kids at High School in it&#8230;<br />
It would be funny as hell, for me anyway <img src='http://blog.cardomain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
.<br />
.<br />
Also, I&#8217;d like to see this on Power Tour&#8230;<br />
.<br />
That would raise eyebrows a bit&#8230;<br />
.<br />
.<br />
What a funny looking car&#8230;<br />
.<br />
The sad thing is that someone actually thought it<br />
would be a good idea to build this&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39182</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39182</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt; the only time I laughed at a similar car was in &quot;planes trains and automobiles&quot;... I never wanted to abandon american autos so badly in my life in reality....&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p> the only time I laughed at a similar car was in &#8220;planes trains and automobiles&#8221;&#8230; I never wanted to abandon american autos so badly in my life in reality&#8230;.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7urtle</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39183</link>
		<dc:creator>7urtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39183</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;i hate that wish they mold in the trunk not the bumper&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>i hate that wish they mold in the trunk not the bumper</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTwildfire</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39184</link>
		<dc:creator>GTwildfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39184</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Remove the bulbous ass from the car, keep the woodtone and all else and I&#039;d like it *slightly* better than the wretched, lowly usual K-car.&lt;br /&gt;
-&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m not saying that I&#039;d like it... only like it *slightly* better, which basically still amounts to hating it only not quite as much.&lt;br /&gt;
-&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t see how those things ever became popular.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Remove the bulbous ass from the car, keep the woodtone and all else and I&#8217;d like it *slightly* better than the wretched, lowly usual K-car.<br />
-<br />
I&#8217;m not saying that I&#8217;d like it&#8230; only like it *slightly* better, which basically still amounts to hating it only not quite as much.<br />
-<br />
I can&#8217;t see how those things ever became popular.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39185</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39185</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;John Voight&#039;s LeBaron maybe?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>John Voight&#8217;s LeBaron maybe?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kap0w</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co/comment-page-1/#comment-39186</link>
		<dc:creator>kap0w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/k-car-with-a-co#comment-39186</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Are you saying that this is FACTORY!?!  Atrocious doesn&#039;t begin to describe it.  My only question is why haven&#039;t I seen this at the top of world&#039;s ugliest car lists with the good old &#039;Tek?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Are you saying that this is FACTORY!?!  Atrocious doesn&#8217;t begin to describe it.  My only question is why haven&#8217;t I seen this at the top of world&#8217;s ugliest car lists with the good old &#8216;Tek?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

