

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vantage vs. GranTurismo: Which Would You Choose?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seregagenatsvale</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41236</link>
		<dc:creator>seregagenatsvale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41236</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Aston for me, now with a 4.7 L V8 it has been clocked at 4.7 sec to 60 m/h. Thats .2 faster than the Granturismo S. It is more beautiful too, while being less sophisticated. Obvioulsy with the spot pack and the weight advantage a better track choice... Maserati is too non-sporty: the 10 year old Aston DB7 Vantage went faster than the S model does now. The GranTurismo has the same acceleration as the 1988 Aston Virage or the 1996 XKR. A GT car should be faster than the next Ford Mustang GT.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Aston for me, now with a 4.7 L V8 it has been clocked at 4.7 sec to 60 m/h. Thats .2 faster than the Granturismo S. It is more beautiful too, while being less sophisticated. Obvioulsy with the spot pack and the weight advantage a better track choice&#8230; Maserati is too non-sporty: the 10 year old Aston DB7 Vantage went faster than the S model does now. The GranTurismo has the same acceleration as the 1988 Aston Virage or the 1996 XKR. A GT car should be faster than the next Ford Mustang GT.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41237</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 06:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41237</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;aston martin&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>aston martin</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhillaz</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41238</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhillaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41238</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Maserati: I&#039;ve always preferred Maserati, but the main reason is that Aston Martin have dragged out this look for too long. Although the Aston is hailed as a perfect looking car from every angle...&lt;br /&gt;
...It&#039;s the MASERATI for me.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Maserati: I&#8217;ve always preferred Maserati, but the main reason is that Aston Martin have dragged out this look for too long. Although the Aston is hailed as a perfect looking car from every angle&#8230;<br />
&#8230;It&#8217;s the MASERATI for me.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NobiZero</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41239</link>
		<dc:creator>NobiZero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41239</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;The Astons all look the same. Maserati gets my vote.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The Astons all look the same. Maserati gets my vote.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goose</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41240</link>
		<dc:creator>goose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41240</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Aston, but really, who would say no to either one????????&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Aston, but really, who would say no to either one????????</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41241</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41241</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Aston is better, but really, who would say no to either one?????&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Aston is better, but really, who would say no to either one?????</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HEMI Cruiser</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41242</link>
		<dc:creator>HEMI Cruiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41242</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but both these cars as well as the Jaguar XK are built on the same platform are they not? So essentially your getting basically the same thing either way you go. But anyway, I think the Maserati has a more sexy look to it! And if I&#039;m dreaming of being rich, lets dream big and have one of each!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but both these cars as well as the Jaguar XK are built on the same platform are they not? So essentially your getting basically the same thing either way you go. But anyway, I think the Maserati has a more sexy look to it! And if I&#8217;m dreaming of being rich, lets dream big and have one of each!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41243</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Totally the Aston Martin, just a wonderful car and looks like way too much fun! &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Totally the Aston Martin, just a wonderful car and looks like way too much fun! </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41244</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41244</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;i would have to go with the Auston Martin out of these 2 but would rather have the Audi R8&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>i would have to go with the Auston Martin out of these 2 but would rather have the Audi R8</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g/comment-page-2/#comment-41245</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/v8-vantage-vs-g#comment-41245</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Ide usually go with the Maserati but they only come with automatic? Cmon. I gotta go wit the Aston Martin this time. And who needs back mini back seats anway??&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Ide usually go with the Maserati but they only come with automatic? Cmon. I gotta go wit the Aston Martin this time. And who needs back mini back seats anway??</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

