<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copperstate 1000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/16/copperstate-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/16/copperstate-100/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Automotive news &#38; crazy member rides from the CarDomain Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ernzen</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/16/copperstate-100/#comment-22212</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ernzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/copperstate-100#comment-22212</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Same.  While I love cars of all types, there&#039;s just something about classic cars that just appeal to me more.  I think it&#039;s the variation and uniqueness of so many of them.  Back then, car models would change from one year to the next, sometimes more.  Then there&#039;s coachbuilding, which I obviously love.  I also like that sometimes, things were done solely for style, regardless of how they effected the car.  I like that it was more of an art, than a science back then.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Same.  While I love cars of all types, there&#8217;s just something about classic cars that just appeal to me more.  I think it&#8217;s the variation and uniqueness of so many of them.  Back then, car models would change from one year to the next, sometimes more.  Then there&#8217;s coachbuilding, which I obviously love.  I also like that sometimes, things were done solely for style, regardless of how they effected the car.  I like that it was more of an art, than a science back then.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oafman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/07/16/copperstate-100/#comment-22222</link>
		<dc:creator>Oafman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/copperstate-100#comment-22222</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Nice pictures.  I love those vintage events, there is not many places that you can see that kind of variety in classic cars.  &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Nice pictures.  I love those vintage events, there is not many places that you can see that kind of variety in classic cars.  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
