<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CTS-V Sneers, M5 and E63 AMG Wince, Cower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Automotive news &#38; crazy member rides from the CarDomain Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:06:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott R.</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15814</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15814</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;If it weren&#039;t for BMW, neither GM nor MB would even make cars like this.  Wait for the new M5 ; &gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If it weren&#8217;t for BMW, neither GM nor MB would even make cars like this.  Wait for the new M5 ; >.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abraham</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15815</link>
		<dc:creator>abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15815</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Cadillac has great technology.Nice to read.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Cadillac has great technology.Nice to read.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sim</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15816</link>
		<dc:creator>Sim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15816</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Good Stuff but the E63 is still my fav.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Good Stuff but the E63 is still my fav.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15817</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15817</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;CTS-V Sneers..such a Amazing car it is!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>CTS-V Sneers..such a Amazing car it is!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15818</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15818</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;CTS-V Sneers..such a Amazing car it is!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>CTS-V Sneers..such a Amazing car it is!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15819</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15819</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stupidest gas guzzling piece of shit...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I wanted plastic, I&#039;d buy a normal GM car. Cadillac can&#039;t compare with MB.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This car is junk. Looks like shit, and so what if it has all that power? Its value depreciates worse than a Ford Focus. Sorry, but to compare it with a Mercedes or BMW is just not right. Having owned a CTS-V in the original form for a year, I can categorically say that it was the biggest piece of crap I have ever owned.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only decent thing was it&#039;s engine. The rest of the car--the way it burned gas, shifted, handled, and braked--was terrible. The car was a rattle trap after only a year, even with low miles and excellent care by the book.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s easy to look at a brochure and say what a great car it will be. But you need to own one to really know what&#039;s going on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s GM, they&#039;ll develop a car that is good in some aspects, but the beancounters make it cheap. You&#039;ll see some very obvious places where someone decided to save a few cents, but it gives an overall cheap feeling to the car. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Stupidest gas guzzling piece of shit&#8230;</p>
<p>If I wanted plastic, I&#8217;d buy a normal GM car. Cadillac can&#8217;t compare with MB.</p>
<p>This car is junk. Looks like shit, and so what if it has all that power? Its value depreciates worse than a Ford Focus. Sorry, but to compare it with a Mercedes or BMW is just not right. Having owned a CTS-V in the original form for a year, I can categorically say that it was the biggest piece of crap I have ever owned.</p>
<p>The only decent thing was it&#8217;s engine. The rest of the car&#8211;the way it burned gas, shifted, handled, and braked&#8211;was terrible. The car was a rattle trap after only a year, even with low miles and excellent care by the book.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to look at a brochure and say what a great car it will be. But you need to own one to really know what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s GM, they&#8217;ll develop a car that is good in some aspects, but the beancounters make it cheap. You&#8217;ll see some very obvious places where someone decided to save a few cents, but it gives an overall cheap feeling to the car. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15820</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15820</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also not a fan of plastic covers.  I want to see the motor dammit!  Auto makers don&#039;t want people to work on their own cars anymore...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Still an awsome car though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Also not a fan of plastic covers.  I want to see the motor dammit!  Auto makers don&#8217;t want people to work on their own cars anymore&#8230;</p>
<p>
Still an awsome car though.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15821</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15821</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Just read that article.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry Benz and Bimmer boys...&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
GM Rules!  &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Just read that article.<br />
.<br />
Sorry Benz and Bimmer boys&#8230;<br />
.<br />
GM Rules!  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cknarf</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15824</link>
		<dc:creator>cknarf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15824</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;RAPED!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>RAPED!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5/#comment-15828</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/cts-v-sneers-m5#comment-15828</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Some day, I&#039;m getting a CTS-V.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
Some day....&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Some day, I&#8217;m getting a CTS-V.<br />
.<br />
Some day&#8230;.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
