« Behold the Volt CarDomain Blog Home Nissan Cube Has 4WD… Sorta »
August 29, 2008
Wrightspeed X1
By Evan
NWSilverado
Electric cars and hybrids are all the rage right now, and with gas prices still pretty high it’s no wonder that we’re looking at other alternatives. Jen blogged last month about bringing back the EV1, and though I’m surprised that GM is so cold on the idea, I guess a lot their reluctance has to do with fear of undermining the Volt. Aside from the overpriced Tesla, the one-off AC Propulsion eBox and a handful of in-city EV’s that can’t do much over 30 mph, there just hasn’t been anything that exciting or attainable among the EV offerings.
Hopefully Chevy’s Volt will begin to change that landscape, but it looks like it’s going to have some electrifying competition by the time it comes to market. Ian Wright’s Wrightspeed X1 could be hitting showrooms at around the same time. No word yet on pricing or availability, but these sweet rides are definitely generating some buzz. According to the FAQs, the Wrightspeed may be recharged at either 120 or 220v, reducing charging time. And unlike today’s hybrids, the Wrightspeed is a battery-only car with no gas motor whatsoever. Ian Wright, formerly of Tesla Motors, left the company in 1996 to pursue this venture, and it appears his dream is close to being realized.
The only question is, how much higher will its price tag be than the $65,000 of the gas-powered Atom on which the X1 prototype was based?
Comments
Post a comment
Please login to CarDomain to post a comment.

0
0


O. Emry
Sep 1, 2008 at 3:52 am
Corrections: Ian Wright didn’t leave in 1996; 2006 sounds more plausible. AC Propulsion’s eBox isn’t a one-off; we’ve build about 15 so far.
EVs are in short supply because of low demand. Low demand is caused by the fact that EVs are still expensive. Forcing auto makers to build expensive cars and sell them at a loss isn’t a practical solution, and it backfired when California tried it the first time. (The automakers fought it tooth and nail and in the end everyone lost.)
The best bet is to drive consumer demand — if there’s one thing that’s clear, it’s that auto companies will build what consumers demand (and will pay for). Unfortunately, the cars will be expensive for a while. The good thing is that the cost is front-loaded, i.e. they cost more up front, but the operating cost is negligible.
Derrick
Aug 29, 2008 at 2:26 pm
That’s one hell of a Power Wheels!
Doug Korthof
Aug 29, 2008 at 2:24 pm
You’re forgetting the hundreds of Toyota RAV4-EV all-electric plug-in cars on the road, and the fact that GM or Toyota could make an EV at any time, if they were forced to do so.
But they will avoid it as long as they can, in deference to the powerful oil companies — which also influenced Obama to keep shut-up about Electric cars in his acceptance speech. Even the Dems are sucking up to the power of the oil companies.
GTwildfire
Aug 29, 2008 at 2:39 am
We need to get away from Lithium Ion. It’s planned obsolescence in action, the Auto industry clinging on to what is widely used and saying it’s state of the art technology… and it’s not.
-
The batteries are the core of an electric vehicle more so than even the motors that propel it. Gasoline is gasoline, the last drop giving off the same energy as the first, whereas batteries hold and release charges and their output varies as a result.
-
An electric car’s design and in the real world will only perform within the limitations defined by it’s batteries abilities. Lithium Ion may charge faster and last longer than NiCad and of course Lead Acid, but is Lithium Ion good enough to meet the demands of consumers, thus with the cars they power be able to meet those needs?
-
For everyday use, for commuting or getting groceries. For taking more extended trips to meet friends or relatives or just take a drive to somewhere not around the corner on the weekend? No, most EV’s of today and perhaps even some currently being designed will not be adequate.
-
Auto makers can dance around moving on to providing better battery technology in their EVs but it won’t benefit them nor consumers in the long run. It seems that there’s either a reluctance for them to forge ahead or perhaps just an unwillingness.
-
I’m sure cost is cited as one major reason why Detroit is clinging to Li Ion, although volume, competition and streamlining production always drives the cost of new technologies down, and that can happen rapidly anymore. When LCD monitors first hit the market, a 15″ screen cost over $1500, now you can’t even find a screen that small and the larger smallest ones available now cost only a couple hundred. Cell phones used to cost hundreds, not including the contractual obligations, now you can get one equipped with a camera, bluetooth and no contract – with a 10 cents a minute rate – for fifty bucks.
-
It’s time to honestly take a leap forward with electric vehicles. Give them what they need to compete in the market and become successful. Ditch Lithium Ion and let’s move on to something better… it’s out there waiting.
Bobby
Aug 29, 2008 at 2:20 am
that guy could use a helmet