

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeep EV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev/comment-page-1/#comment-52880</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev#comment-52880</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Is it just me or will this just dilute the Jeep brand(name?) even more than it is now. Jeeps are about more than getting over that little mound of dirt someone left in the middle of the road. I just don&#039;t think this thing has a soul like it should.&lt;br /&gt;
-&lt;br /&gt;
These little revisions might help  &lt;br /&gt;
1. swap the gas generator for a diesel one&lt;br /&gt;
2. nix all those heavy batteries&lt;br /&gt;
3. put a motor on each axle (of at least 200hp each)&lt;br /&gt;
4. get rid of those damn back doors&lt;br /&gt;
5. make sure its as capable a Rubicon&lt;br /&gt;
6. no fucking bling on it, it&#039;s just gonna get dirty anyway, that and it looks terrible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Is it just me or will this just dilute the Jeep brand(name?) even more than it is now. Jeeps are about more than getting over that little mound of dirt someone left in the middle of the road. I just don&#8217;t think this thing has a soul like it should.<br />
-<br />
These little revisions might help  <br />
1. swap the gas generator for a diesel one<br />
2. nix all those heavy batteries<br />
3. put a motor on each axle (of at least 200hp each)<br />
4. get rid of those damn back doors<br />
5. make sure its as capable a Rubicon<br />
6. no fucking bling on it, it&#8217;s just gonna get dirty anyway, that and it looks terrible.
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev/comment-page-1/#comment-52881</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev#comment-52881</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;this is really cool &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>this is really cool </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTwildfire</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev/comment-page-1/#comment-52882</link>
		<dc:creator>GTwildfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev#comment-52882</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;eventually somebody&#039;s gonna come out with an EV that uses new non-lithium battery technology. Each one of these initial offerings is a notch showing progression to that day. EVs can be more efficient and have a longer range with technology currently available. We&#039;re waiting...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>eventually somebody&#8217;s gonna come out with an EV that uses new non-lithium battery technology. Each one of these initial offerings is a notch showing progression to that day. EVs can be more efficient and have a longer range with technology currently available. We&#8217;re waiting&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev/comment-page-1/#comment-52883</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/jeep-ev#comment-52883</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;i love that painted roof. it looks like the mercedes G class SUV from behind. and i really like where daimler-chrysler is going with this.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>i love that painted roof. it looks like the mercedes G class SUV from behind. and i really like where daimler-chrysler is going with this.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

