«   CarDomain Blog Home   »

September 29, 2008

Spy Threat

By Don Roy

UberDrive Magazine

When a New Jersey woman fitted a GPS tracking device to her husband’s car last year, she got a lot more than she bargained for. The device, a LandAirSea GPS Tracking Key, is half the size of a cigarette pack, waterproof and comes with a strong, magnetic mount. For as long as its batteries last, it will record driving speed on a second-by-second basis, as well as the location, time and date of every stop the vehicle makes. A set of batteries can easily last two weeks. Suspecting her husband of infidelity, she did not mention the device and by any definition was clearly engaging in an invasion of his privacy.

Days later, the husband was involved in what appeared to be a tragic accident. While taking family babysitter home, they stopped to look at some horses from a countryt road. George Ford, Jr. of Piscataway, NJ, told police that he accidentally ran over the 12-year old girl as he turned his truck around to leave. However, once investigators for the Chenango County Sheriff’s Department found the GPS device, a different story emerged. Continue reading…

Spy Threat

Sherriff Thomas Loughren said that the GPS tracking data proved that Ford was with the girl for three hours before he killed her. "This evidence is really unusual in a homocide case," Loughren said. "But, in this particular case, it’s crucial. Without this evidence from the GPS Tracking Key, we would have no case." Lacking that evidence, George Ford, Jr, could only have been charged with reckless endangerment.

Devices similar to the LandAirSea Tracking Key are commonly used in trucks to provide location information to dispatchers, or in rental fleets to assist in theft recovery. Past challenges to the use of GPS-based devices that record or transmit usage and location data have raised an entirely new segment of privacy considerations that are far from settled at this point.

A similar product, called GPS-Snitch form Blackline GPS Inc., of Calgary, Canada, has transmission capability that allows it to be tracked with an Internet application on your computer or web-capable cell phone. Intended as a security device, the GPS-Snitch can send you a text message or email once it has moved outside a specified perimeter. Data that has been recorded can also be exported to Google Earth format and replayed in a virtual environment that is enhanced with satellite imagery.

Read the rest of this story at UberDrive Magazine.

Comments

Anonymous
Sep 30, 2008 at 5:35 pm

the only problem is, sure it sounds harmless now by only targeting the bad guys, but how far does it have to go to be too far? Big brother always starts off harmless but then it because dangerous when the Government is watching over everyone. Just like this Patriot Act, sure it seems like its only targeting terrorists, however it only starts there. Ron Paul for the long haul!

RatsEatChildren
Sep 30, 2008 at 5:50 am

In this case, the ends totally justify the means. Nice job, New Jersey wife! Now if only a greater percentage of scumbags were spied upon more regularly.

7urtle
Sep 30, 2008 at 4:20 am

i dunno. ididnt know husband/wife could invade privacy

melville248
Sep 29, 2008 at 6:47 pm

Okay, that’s disgusting and creepy. The wife was smart enough to know something was going on with her husband, but not soon enough to save that little girls life. I am sure she didn’t expect what she found out. So, by her invading her husbands privacy, she got him on a murder charge. They never really tell you what happens, but that seems to be the case. Spy threat, big brother, creepiness.

Phantomdeity
Sep 29, 2008 at 6:46 pm

We are well past 1984, but Big Brother is catching up. While I can see a number of benefits to tracking technology like this, the risks for potential abuse are far too great in my opinion. Insurance companies would have greater control over consumers and the rates they pay, Corporate enitities would have more ways to control their staff, and government would have a much easier time circumventing privacy laws (which they already routinely trample over). There is always the “Nothing to hide, nothing to fear” arguement, but its a scary thing to think about when you consider what this technology could provide to someone with less than the best of intentions.

Post a comment

Please login to CarDomain to post a comment.