the only problem is, sure it sounds harmless now by only targeting the bad guys, but how far does it have to go to be too far? Big brother always starts off harmless but then it because dangerous when the Government is watching over everyone. Just like this Patriot Act, sure it seems like its only targeting terrorists, however it only starts there. Ron Paul for the long haul!

In this case, the ends totally justify the means. Nice job, New Jersey wife! Now if only a greater percentage of scumbags were spied upon more regularly.

i dunno. ididnt know husband/wife could invade privacy

Okay, that’s disgusting and creepy. The wife was smart enough to know something was going on with her husband, but not soon enough to save that little girls life. I am sure she didn’t expect what she found out. So, by her invading her husbands privacy, she got him on a murder charge. They never really tell you what happens, but that seems to be the case. Spy threat, big brother, creepiness.

We are well past 1984, but Big Brother is catching up. While I can see a number of benefits to tracking technology like this, the risks for potential abuse are far too great in my opinion. Insurance companies would have greater control over consumers and the rates they pay, Corporate enitities would have more ways to control their staff, and government would have a much easier time circumventing privacy laws (which they already routinely trample over). There is always the “Nothing to hide, nothing to fear” arguement, but its a scary thing to think about when you consider what this technology could provide to someone with less than the best of intentions.