

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WTF? Dodge Cancels Challenger Convertible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55280</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55280</guid>
		<description>American auto makers are losing their behinds because nothing they make can touch Honda V-Technology. I wouldn&#039;t be caught dead in an American car. I just like living in the U.S.A. to bum state benifits like E.D.D., permanent disability, and welfare. Great country, good benefits to people who don&#039;t need them, and bad automobiles. This is a dream come true to my Turkish ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American auto makers are losing their behinds because nothing they make can touch Honda V-Technology. I wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead in an American car. I just like living in the U.S.A. to bum state benifits like E.D.D., permanent disability, and welfare. Great country, good benefits to people who don&#8217;t need them, and bad automobiles. This is a dream come true to my Turkish ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricinct</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55244</link>
		<dc:creator>ricinct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55244</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;No wonder American auto makers are losing market share..its self fulfilling!! The same thing happened with the PT cruiser..they waited what.. 3 or four YEARS before they did a rag top..by then consumers were cooling to the design..they should also have done a PT mini pickup like the old Rampage...these people are just plain lazy!! they design ONE body style and then go home....I remember the Marauder convt. at the car show....wonderful car..plus memo to the idiots at Chrysler...more body styles means more sales ..more trips to the dealer..for service etc etc...while we are on the subject...do these guys even go to auctions..Cuda&#039;s sell for double that of Challengers...they really should have made the Cuda or Both lines!!&lt;br /&gt;
I remember going to the NYC show when they introduced the Mustang Mach 1 with the Shaker hood. A Ford exec. was standing there and I said ..nice car they should make a topless version..she turned to me and said...&quot;they didn&#039;t make a Mach 1 convt. back in the sixties!!! Ford actually pays someone to think this way...how about this... build proto-types and get some feedback from the public..u know the people who BUY the Friggen CARS!!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>No wonder American auto makers are losing market share..its self fulfilling!! The same thing happened with the PT cruiser..they waited what.. 3 or four YEARS before they did a rag top..by then consumers were cooling to the design..they should also have done a PT mini pickup like the old Rampage&#8230;these people are just plain lazy!! they design ONE body style and then go home&#8230;.I remember the Marauder convt. at the car show&#8230;.wonderful car..plus memo to the idiots at Chrysler&#8230;more body styles means more sales ..more trips to the dealer..for service etc etc&#8230;while we are on the subject&#8230;do these guys even go to auctions..Cuda&#8217;s sell for double that of Challengers&#8230;they really should have made the Cuda or Both lines!!<br />
I remember going to the NYC show when they introduced the Mustang Mach 1 with the Shaker hood. A Ford exec. was standing there and I said ..nice car they should make a topless version..she turned to me and said&#8230;&#8221;they didn&#8217;t make a Mach 1 convt. back in the sixties!!! Ford actually pays someone to think this way&#8230;how about this&#8230; build proto-types and get some feedback from the public..u know the people who BUY the Friggen CARS!!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmagster</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55245</link>
		<dc:creator>dmagster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55245</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Appearently none of you people are old enough to remember that the 1970 Challenger (which the current car car is modeled after) could be had in both a hard top AND a convertible.&lt;br /&gt;
I too think that the new Challenger should be built from the factory as a convertible along with the hardtop! &lt;br /&gt;
Nothing could be better than a brand new big V8 powered rear wheel drive sexy Challenger driven with the top down on a nice sunny summer day! Ahh.   &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Appearently none of you people are old enough to remember that the 1970 Challenger (which the current car car is modeled after) could be had in both a hard top AND a convertible.<br />
I too think that the new Challenger should be built from the factory as a convertible along with the hardtop! <br />
Nothing could be better than a brand new big V8 powered rear wheel drive sexy Challenger driven with the top down on a nice sunny summer day! Ahh.   </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55246</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55246</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;i dont understand, i saw some guy near my house taking pictures of a orange new challenger convertible with big aftermarket wheels. is it possible that guy had his challenger custom made? i didnt think anything of it at the time because i thought they were selling them already along side the coupe &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>i dont understand, i saw some guy near my house taking pictures of a orange new challenger convertible with big aftermarket wheels. is it possible that guy had his challenger custom made? i didnt think anything of it at the time because i thought they were selling them already along side the coupe </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55247</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55247</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;build the convertible please&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>build the convertible please</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55248</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55248</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;NOT BAD, WHY DIDNT CHRYSLER THINK OF A REMOVEABLETOP? IT MIGHT WORK.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>NOT BAD, WHY DIDNT CHRYSLER THINK OF A REMOVEABLETOP? IT MIGHT WORK.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55249</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55249</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Actually it doesn&#039;t look bad.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Actually it doesn&#8217;t look bad.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djez016</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55250</link>
		<dc:creator>djez016</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55250</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;DAMN IT IM MAKING MY OWN&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>DAMN IT IM MAKING MY OWN</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55251</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55251</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Dude, it already weighs like 4000 pounds. Why throw the top down with this big ass car? I agree w/ the no Convo decision. Still wouldn&#039;t buy it either way. &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Dude, it already weighs like 4000 pounds. Why throw the top down with this big ass car? I agree w/ the no Convo decision. Still wouldn&#8217;t buy it either way. </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoe</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance/comment-page-1/#comment-55252</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/wtf-dodge-cance#comment-55252</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;garbage&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>garbage</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

