

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM/Chrysler Merger on Hold!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg/comment-page-1/#comment-59086</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 11:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg#comment-59086</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I was thinking... Chrysler probably has enough spare parts lying around to whip up something extrordinary like Ford did with the original &#039;64 1/2 Mustang. Why doesn&#039;t Chrysler reposition and refocus. Jeep is obviously the offroad brand and should remain so, but I don&#039;t think a Jeep pickup would dig into Ram sales figures so why not? Also Chrysler should try to aim for Cadillac while Dodge remains performance oriented. resurect Plymouth to compete with less expensive luxo brands like Buick. Well, Challenger-based Superbird would be nice, but if they at least luxoed the Challenger slightly and called it a Roadrunner, I think it would sell. And finally, why don&#039;t they bring back AMC to compete with Scion for the younger market? AMC was known for building mold-breaking quirky cars in the first place, something Scion picked up on, so a new Gremlin might actually appeal to 18-34 year old car buyers.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I was thinking&#8230; Chrysler probably has enough spare parts lying around to whip up something extrordinary like Ford did with the original &#8217;64 1/2 Mustang. Why doesn&#8217;t Chrysler reposition and refocus. Jeep is obviously the offroad brand and should remain so, but I don&#8217;t think a Jeep pickup would dig into Ram sales figures so why not? Also Chrysler should try to aim for Cadillac while Dodge remains performance oriented. resurect Plymouth to compete with less expensive luxo brands like Buick. Well, Challenger-based Superbird would be nice, but if they at least luxoed the Challenger slightly and called it a Roadrunner, I think it would sell. And finally, why don&#8217;t they bring back AMC to compete with Scion for the younger market? AMC was known for building mold-breaking quirky cars in the first place, something Scion picked up on, so a new Gremlin might actually appeal to 18-34 year old car buyers.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeep4life</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg/comment-page-1/#comment-59087</link>
		<dc:creator>jeep4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg#comment-59087</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&quot;what a twist&quot;? lol ok m. night shamalon lol i heard that if gm buys out crysler then there gonna get rid of crysler and dodge and keep jeep to replace the hummer line-up. did anyone else hear about this? or just myself.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>&#8220;what a twist&#8221;? lol ok m. night shamalon lol i heard that if gm buys out crysler then there gonna get rid of crysler and dodge and keep jeep to replace the hummer line-up. did anyone else hear about this? or just myself.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7urtle</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg/comment-page-1/#comment-59088</link>
		<dc:creator>7urtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg#comment-59088</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;plz no gm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>plz no gm
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg/comment-page-1/#comment-59089</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 11:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg#comment-59089</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;if gm buys chrysler im disowning my truck&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>if gm buys chrysler im disowning my truck</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cd</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg/comment-page-1/#comment-59090</link>
		<dc:creator>Cd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 06:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg#comment-59090</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Hmm... offspring of the Corvette + Viper, or the GT-R + Viper???  Wow, tough choice...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Hmm&#8230; offspring of the Corvette + Viper, or the GT-R + Viper???  Wow, tough choice&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cknarf</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg/comment-page-1/#comment-59091</link>
		<dc:creator>cknarf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/gmchrysler-merg#comment-59091</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;What a twist!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>What a twist!
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

