

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#039;Cuda Cues on a Challenger?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60904</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60904</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;LOOKIN PRETTY SAWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>LOOKIN PRETTY SAWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fortyfordsedan</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60905</link>
		<dc:creator>fortyfordsedan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60905</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I like the cues, but I wish the people doing them would take some of the challenger cues off the car, like the TA hood, taking teh dodge emblem of the hood wouldn&#039;t hurt either.  If it had a shaker hood and something that looked more like the 70 grill, that would be bad ass.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I like the cues, but I wish the people doing them would take some of the challenger cues off the car, like the TA hood, taking teh dodge emblem of the hood wouldn&#8217;t hurt either.  If it had a shaker hood and something that looked more like the 70 grill, that would be bad ass.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick bean</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60906</link>
		<dc:creator>nick bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60906</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;is it me or hasn&#039;t the new challenger always resembled a &#039;cuda more than a challenger to begin with.  Dodge should of just named it the &#039;cuda and been done with it.  I think the styling cues look freaking sweet too.  If I had one I would paint the AAR flat black stripes on the side.  would love to get behind the wheel of the 6.1 procharged!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>is it me or hasn&#8217;t the new challenger always resembled a &#8216;cuda more than a challenger to begin with.  Dodge should of just named it the &#8216;cuda and been done with it.  I think the styling cues look freaking sweet too.  If I had one I would paint the AAR flat black stripes on the side.  would love to get behind the wheel of the 6.1 procharged!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60907</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60907</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Personally, I think the new Camaro is ugly. GM just doesn&#039;t have a handle on the whole retro thing, but I think a new Trans Am or Firebird would definitely help the styling. I&#039;ve liked the drawings I&#039;ve seen so far. On a sidenote, what I really wanna see is someone, hopefully Dodge, turn the new Challenger into a retro-looking Superbird!!!! Shelby&#039;s got the KR, So a new &#039;Bird would definitely complete the new muscle car lineup!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Personally, I think the new Camaro is ugly. GM just doesn&#8217;t have a handle on the whole retro thing, but I think a new Trans Am or Firebird would definitely help the styling. I&#8217;ve liked the drawings I&#8217;ve seen so far. On a sidenote, what I really wanna see is someone, hopefully Dodge, turn the new Challenger into a retro-looking Superbird!!!! Shelby&#8217;s got the KR, So a new &#8216;Bird would definitely complete the new muscle car lineup!!!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cknarf</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60908</link>
		<dc:creator>cknarf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60908</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Screw the camaro! bring back the Firebird!&lt;br /&gt;
The drawings/renderings I&#039;ve seen kick so much ass!&lt;br /&gt;
-&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve always wanted them to remake each generation, in order.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Screw the camaro! bring back the Firebird!<br />
The drawings/renderings I&#8217;ve seen kick so much ass!<br />
-<br />
I&#8217;ve always wanted them to remake each generation, in order.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60909</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60909</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;meh, i like the challenger better with the cuda cues. then again my dream car is a 71 cuda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>meh, i like the challenger better with the cuda cues. then again my dream car is a 71 cuda.
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highspeedhijinks</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60910</link>
		<dc:creator>Highspeedhijinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60910</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;We better !!!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>We better !!!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son Of a Beach</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60911</link>
		<dc:creator>Son Of a Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60911</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sure there are more than a few tuners who are frustrated that there is not a Plymouth version to work on. Since Chrysler killed the brand, the only recourse for these guys is to apply Cuda history to the Challenger. GM hasn&#039;t killed Pontiac yet, but it&#039;s not outside the realm of possibility that a Firebird conversion will occur, there is a fanbase for this as well. It quite possibly will come in the form of a showcar from GM itself, provided GM survives its financial woes. If not, then a tuner will do it, and there is nothing wrong with that. It&#039;s &quot;possibilities&quot; explored.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are more than a few tuners who are frustrated that there is not a Plymouth version to work on. Since Chrysler killed the brand, the only recourse for these guys is to apply Cuda history to the Challenger. GM hasn&#8217;t killed Pontiac yet, but it&#8217;s not outside the realm of possibility that a Firebird conversion will occur, there is a fanbase for this as well. It quite possibly will come in the form of a showcar from GM itself, provided GM survives its financial woes. If not, then a tuner will do it, and there is nothing wrong with that. It&#8217;s &#8220;possibilities&#8221; explored.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maffew</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60912</link>
		<dc:creator>Maffew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60912</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;its not a bad thing at all Rob.  Like tony said below, its all about individualisation.  If chrysler cant make a cuda since the plymouth brand is gone, why not make a challenger look like one?  If GM cant get their heads out of their ass to change a few pieces of sheetmetal and double their exposure with a firebird, why can&#039;t we?  It&#039;s the same thing people have been doing forever.  Turning 90&#039;s models caprices into Impala SS clones, changing the trim on an old tempest to make it a GTO clone, etc.  &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>its not a bad thing at all Rob.  Like tony said below, its all about individualisation.  If chrysler cant make a cuda since the plymouth brand is gone, why not make a challenger look like one?  If GM cant get their heads out of their ass to change a few pieces of sheetmetal and double their exposure with a firebird, why can&#8217;t we?  It&#8217;s the same thing people have been doing forever.  Turning 90&#8242;s models caprices into Impala SS clones, changing the trim on an old tempest to make it a GTO clone, etc.  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Cassa</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a/comment-page-1/#comment-60913</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Cassa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/cuda-cues-on-a#comment-60913</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Good question there Rob. They almost have an identity crisis. But I don&#039;t think new Camaro owners will install firebird cues...but I could be wrong. But overall, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a bad thing at all. Afterall, it&#039;s all about individualisation.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Good question there Rob. They almost have an identity crisis. But I don&#8217;t think new Camaro owners will install firebird cues&#8230;but I could be wrong. But overall, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a bad thing at all. Afterall, it&#8217;s all about individualisation.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

