

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week&#039;s Amoco Ultimate Winner!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paco Ibarra</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62909</link>
		<dc:creator>Paco Ibarra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62909</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Ah.. the hotness!!!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Ah.. the hotness!!!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FuryPaul</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62910</link>
		<dc:creator>FuryPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62910</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m a Mopar guy through and through, but if I had the bucks to build a real collection I&#039;d definitely have to have a &#039;70-&#039;73 Camaro in it. They were really gorgeous cars before they got hit with the 5-mph bumper standards, and this one looks like a great example.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;m a Mopar guy through and through, but if I had the bucks to build a real collection I&#8217;d definitely have to have a &#8217;70-&#8217;73 Camaro in it. They were really gorgeous cars before they got hit with the 5-mph bumper standards, and this one looks like a great example.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62911</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62911</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not a big fan of the second gen. It&#039;s not the body that turns me away, it&#039;s the nose, but he clearly dropped a sweet f-bomb here, the photo is spectacular, kinda makes me want one, but I already got a &#039;66 Stang in the stable, and I don&#039;t think they&#039;d play nice with each other, especially with all the Mustang heritage stuff on the walls, but maybe I&#039;ll go to the dark side someday, but not today...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of the second gen. It&#8217;s not the body that turns me away, it&#8217;s the nose, but he clearly dropped a sweet f-bomb here, the photo is spectacular, kinda makes me want one, but I already got a &#8217;66 Stang in the stable, and I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;d play nice with each other, especially with all the Mustang heritage stuff on the walls, but maybe I&#8217;ll go to the dark side someday, but not today&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62912</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62912</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;BEAUTIFUL Photo!&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;br /&gt;
Really, one of the best I&#039;ve seen!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>BEAUTIFUL Photo!<br />
.<br />
Really, one of the best I&#8217;ve seen!
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HANDO  aka  INFINITI M45 KING!</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62913</link>
		<dc:creator>HANDO  aka  INFINITI M45 KING!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62913</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;wow.. thats a nice photo...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>wow.. thats a nice photo&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence898</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62914</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence898</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62914</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Introduced to market in February 1970, the second-generation Chevrolet Camaro would be in production 12 years. This generation&#039;s styling, inspired in part by Jaguar, Aston Martin, and Ferrari, was longer, lower, and wider than the first generation Camaro. A convertible body-type was no longer available.[1] Although it was an all-new car, the basic mechanical layout of the new Camaro was familiar, engineered much like its predecessor with a unibody structure utilizing a front subframe, A-arm and coil spring front suspension, and rear leaf springs. Without the rushed development program of the first generation, however, and benefiting from a greater budget in light of the first-generation&#039;s clear market success, the chassis and suspension of the second generation was greatly refined in both performance and comfort, and even the base models offered significant advances in sound-proofing, ride isolation, and road-holding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is why its definitely worth it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Introduced to market in February 1970, the second-generation Chevrolet Camaro would be in production 12 years. This generation&#8217;s styling, inspired in part by Jaguar, Aston Martin, and Ferrari, was longer, lower, and wider than the first generation Camaro. A convertible body-type was no longer available.[1] Although it was an all-new car, the basic mechanical layout of the new Camaro was familiar, engineered much like its predecessor with a unibody structure utilizing a front subframe, A-arm and coil spring front suspension, and rear leaf springs. Without the rushed development program of the first generation, however, and benefiting from a greater budget in light of the first-generation&#8217;s clear market success, the chassis and suspension of the second generation was greatly refined in both performance and comfort, and even the base models offered significant advances in sound-proofing, ride isolation, and road-holding.</p>
<p>This is why its definitely worth it.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence898</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62915</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence898</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62915</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Introduced to market in February 1970, the second-generation Chevrolet Camaro would be in production 12 years. This generation&#039;s styling, inspired in part by Jaguar, Aston Martin, and Ferrari, was longer, lower, and wider than the first generation Camaro. A convertible body-type was no longer available.[1] Although it was an all-new car, the basic mechanical layout of the new Camaro was familiar, engineered much like its predecessor with a unibody structure utilizing a front subframe, A-arm and coil spring front suspension, and rear leaf springs. Without the rushed development program of the first generation, however, and benefiting from a greater budget in light of the first-generation&#039;s clear market success, the chassis and suspension of the second generation was greatly refined in both performance and comfort, and even the base models offered significant advances in sound-proofing, ride isolation, and road-holding.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Introduced to market in February 1970, the second-generation Chevrolet Camaro would be in production 12 years. This generation&#8217;s styling, inspired in part by Jaguar, Aston Martin, and Ferrari, was longer, lower, and wider than the first generation Camaro. A convertible body-type was no longer available.[1] Although it was an all-new car, the basic mechanical layout of the new Camaro was familiar, engineered much like its predecessor with a unibody structure utilizing a front subframe, A-arm and coil spring front suspension, and rear leaf springs. Without the rushed development program of the first generation, however, and benefiting from a greater budget in light of the first-generation&#8217;s clear market success, the chassis and suspension of the second generation was greatly refined in both performance and comfort, and even the base models offered significant advances in sound-proofing, ride isolation, and road-holding.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob balderston</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62916</link>
		<dc:creator>bob balderston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62916</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;i finally went over to the dark side and became a gm car guy...i must say that this is by far the best looking of the early f-bodies&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>i finally went over to the dark side and became a gm car guy&#8230;i must say that this is by far the best looking of the early f-bodies</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fixitfixitstop</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62917</link>
		<dc:creator>fixitfixitstop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62917</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;What Gary said.  &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>What Gary said.  </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melville248</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-62918</link>
		<dc:creator>melville248</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/this-weeks-am-1-2#comment-62918</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;It truly is an amazing photo. Oh yeah and the car&#039;s not so bad either!&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>It truly is an amazing photo. Oh yeah and the car&#8217;s not so bad either!</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

