

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chevrolet Factory in Tarrytown, New York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill C</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65147</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65147</guid>
		<description>Great Photos I worked at the Tarrytown Plant From 1985 till 1991.I worked in the paint dept. Elpo Dip.This Plant will be missed by all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Photos I worked at the Tarrytown Plant From 1985 till 1991.I worked in the paint dept. Elpo Dip.This Plant will be missed by all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buster brown</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65146</link>
		<dc:creator>buster brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65146</guid>
		<description>Great photos and nostalgia.  In the summer of 1959 I worked at the Chevrolet plant in Kansas City before going to college. There was very little automation then.  I worked on the frame line mostly, installing drive shafts and brake lines. Installing the big block 348 created problems. Corvettes from St. Louis were also stored there before transit.  Sometimes we drove them around the back lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photos and nostalgia.  In the summer of 1959 I worked at the Chevrolet plant in Kansas City before going to college. There was very little automation then.  I worked on the frame line mostly, installing drive shafts and brake lines. Installing the big block 348 created problems. Corvettes from St. Louis were also stored there before transit.  Sometimes we drove them around the back lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DialM4Speed</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65136</link>
		<dc:creator>DialM4Speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65136</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ahhhh... the good ol days!  American auto factories producing and Americans supporting their own businesses.  Now so-called American just don&#039;t give a fuck as they hop in their honda&#039;s &amp; turdota&#039;s.  Sad really.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhh&#8230; the good ol days!  American auto factories producing and Americans supporting their own businesses.  Now so-called American just don&#8217;t give a fuck as they hop in their honda&#8217;s &#038; turdota&#8217;s.  Sad really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cchriss92</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65137</link>
		<dc:creator>cchriss92</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65137</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Forget that this is about a historic photo gallery from 1959, go ahead and just post your completely unrelated and pointless comments about how your Honda or BMW is far superior to Chevy cars. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p />
<p>Forget that this is about a historic photo gallery from 1959, go ahead and just post your completely unrelated and pointless comments about how your Honda or BMW is far superior to Chevy cars. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65138</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65138</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;To smallblockman69: The &quot;small Chevy&#039;s&quot; also known as the Aveo are NOT the same as Suzuki Areo. They don&#039;t use the same chassis, engine, transmission, or anything else for that matter. The only similarity between them is their size. The Aveo is the Daewoo Kalos built in Korea, rebadged and shipped here. The Suzuki Forenza on the other hand is also built by GM-Daewoo in Korea, and does share a few components with the Aveo. I&#039;m not saying that being built by Daewoo is any better than what you said, but get your info right.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>To smallblockman69: The &#8220;small Chevy&#8217;s&#8221; also known as the Aveo are NOT the same as Suzuki Areo. They don&#8217;t use the same chassis, engine, transmission, or anything else for that matter. The only similarity between them is their size. The Aveo is the Daewoo Kalos built in Korea, rebadged and shipped here. The Suzuki Forenza on the other hand is also built by GM-Daewoo in Korea, and does share a few components with the Aveo. I&#8217;m not saying that being built by Daewoo is any better than what you said, but get your info right.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallblockman69</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65139</link>
		<dc:creator>smallblockman69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65139</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;yes the small chevy&#039;s are suzuki areos&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>yes the small chevy&#8217;s are suzuki areos</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephriam</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65140</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65140</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not so much that the new GM products are that poorly built, as it is they are just &quot;Butt Ugly!&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
For instance: at least the Lincoln Town car is a slightly different looking product than the Ford Crown Victoria.  I was following a new Cadillac SVC (or what ever they call it) today. and I thought to myself....&quot;God! it look&#039;s like a &#039;Blinged out&#039; 10 year old Monty Carlo. (sp?).&lt;br /&gt;
The Hummer is ugly, the Tahoo is ugly and even the small chevy&#039;s look like Suzuki Aeros.&lt;br /&gt;
At least the Ford Focus looks a little different than the Mazada&#039;s they  buy their power plants from....&lt;br /&gt;
and actually gets slightly better gas millage than their Mazada counter parts.&lt;br /&gt;
General Motors has been building some boring shit for years, and now it&#039;s finally starting to catch up with them.  &lt;br /&gt;
   What annoys the hell out of me is, Restored Trans Ams from the mid 1970&#039;s are worth 4 times what my &lt;br /&gt;
1973 280SE 4.5 Mercedes Benze......And I know I can match that 4 door tank up agianst half of those &quot;cracker boxes&quot; GM built back then.  &lt;br /&gt;
What am I talking about!?!?!  I already have.  (Plus 3/4 of the new cars on the road).&lt;br /&gt;
   Most American cars built in the last 50years were built to run the 1/4 mile and then take a shit!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
Do I need to say more?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>It&#8217;s not so much that the new GM products are that poorly built, as it is they are just &#8220;Butt Ugly!&#8221;<br />
For instance: at least the Lincoln Town car is a slightly different looking product than the Ford Crown Victoria.  I was following a new Cadillac SVC (or what ever they call it) today. and I thought to myself&#8230;.&#8221;God! it look&#8217;s like a &#8216;Blinged out&#8217; 10 year old Monty Carlo. (sp?).<br />
The Hummer is ugly, the Tahoo is ugly and even the small chevy&#8217;s look like Suzuki Aeros.<br />
At least the Ford Focus looks a little different than the Mazada&#8217;s they  buy their power plants from&#8230;.<br />
and actually gets slightly better gas millage than their Mazada counter parts.<br />
General Motors has been building some boring shit for years, and now it&#8217;s finally starting to catch up with them.  <br />
   What annoys the hell out of me is, Restored Trans Ams from the mid 1970&#8242;s are worth 4 times what my <br />
1973 280SE 4.5 Mercedes Benze&#8230;&#8230;And I know I can match that 4 door tank up agianst half of those &#8220;cracker boxes&#8221; GM built back then.  <br />
What am I talking about!?!?!  I already have.  (Plus 3/4 of the new cars on the road).<br />
   Most American cars built in the last 50years were built to run the 1/4 mile and then take a shit!!!!<br />
Do I need to say more?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapusta</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65141</link>
		<dc:creator>Kapusta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65141</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;d be all for a big three bailout if they still built cars and trucks as they did back in those days. Now all they&#039;re interested in is shipping our jobs overseas and forcing chinese made crap down our throats.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;d be all for a big three bailout if they still built cars and trucks as they did back in those days. Now all they&#8217;re interested in is shipping our jobs overseas and forcing chinese made crap down our throats.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65142</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65142</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;In 1966 I dated a guy that had a 1959 green two door chevy. He put lights behind the front tires. These pictures sure bring back memories of those &quot;good ole days&quot;. Karen&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>In 1966 I dated a guy that had a 1959 green two door chevy. He put lights behind the front tires. These pictures sure bring back memories of those &#8220;good ole days&#8221;. Karen</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERNIE</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto/comment-page-1/#comment-65143</link>
		<dc:creator>ERNIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardomain.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/chevrolet-facto#comment-65143</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;MY GOSHH !! THESE FOTOS ARE PRICELESS, YOU SHOULD CONTACT GM, THEY MAY PAY YOU A BUNCH, FOR THEM,OR YOU MAY KEEP THEM AS LONG AS POSSIBLE, ONE DAY THEY WILL BE WORTH LOTS OF $$$$$$&lt;br /&gt;
GOOD LUCK !!&lt;br /&gt;
ERNIE&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>MY GOSHH !! THESE FOTOS ARE PRICELESS, YOU SHOULD CONTACT GM, THEY MAY PAY YOU A BUNCH, FOR THEM,OR YOU MAY KEEP THEM AS LONG AS POSSIBLE, ONE DAY THEY WILL BE WORTH LOTS OF $$$$$$<br />
GOOD LUCK !!<br />
ERNIE</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

