

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot: the 2005-08 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texan90</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78212</link>
		<dc:creator>Texan90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78212</guid>
		<description>I would say it is the closest thing to a new gereration muscle car, when you look at the fact that it is based off of an already in production vehicle. That being said, the four doors argument is out, because of cars like the Charger/300C. Also FWD is what most automakers have available to work with now days, just like they had RWD back in the 60&#039;s, 70&#039;s, and mabey into the 80&#039;s. So, you can hate my guts all you want, but I call it a muscle car. Kudos to Rick V. for his logical and non aggressive post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say it is the closest thing to a new gereration muscle car, when you look at the fact that it is based off of an already in production vehicle. That being said, the four doors argument is out, because of cars like the Charger/300C. Also FWD is what most automakers have available to work with now days, just like they had RWD back in the 60&#8242;s, 70&#8242;s, and mabey into the 80&#8242;s. So, you can hate my guts all you want, but I call it a muscle car. Kudos to Rick V. for his logical and non aggressive post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot: 2006 – 08 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS and Impala SS V8 &#124; Car pictures and car wallpapers by the thousand</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78211</link>
		<dc:creator>CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot: 2006 – 08 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS and Impala SS V8 &#124; Car pictures and car wallpapers by the thousand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78211</guid>
		<description>[...] car. I must be out of my mind for doing this post, after the last drubbing I received for the 2005 &#8211; 08 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP, but here I am, trying to convince you that a couple of other GM cars, with a 5.7L V8 can be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] car. I must be out of my mind for doing this post, after the last drubbing I received for the 2005 &#8211; 08 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP, but here I am, trying to convince you that a couple of other GM cars, with a 5.7L V8 can be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonomakid4</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78210</link>
		<dc:creator>sonomakid4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78210</guid>
		<description>not a muscle car but it is definitly a nice car just bought one and the 0-60 time is 5.6 not 6.7 wouldnt spend the retail 32,000 on it tho thats a little pricy for this car but got mine for 15000 with 26000 miles on it cant beat it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not a muscle car but it is definitly a nice car just bought one and the 0-60 time is 5.6 not 6.7 wouldnt spend the retail 32,000 on it tho thats a little pricy for this car but got mine for 15000 with 26000 miles on it cant beat it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigAlH</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78209</link>
		<dc:creator>BigAlH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78209</guid>
		<description>Whoever said 0-60 time was 6.7 is confused.  Whoever mentioned the Lacrosse Super: The Lacrosse is based on the same platform so they are not a smaller car as you imply.  As for the GP GXP being a muscle car, I wouldn&#039;t say they are.  They will however whoop on a lot of Mustangs and 300C based cars at the track.  So muscle car or not, you still lost to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever said 0-60 time was 6.7 is confused.  Whoever mentioned the Lacrosse Super: The Lacrosse is based on the same platform so they are not a smaller car as you imply.  As for the GP GXP being a muscle car, I wouldn&#8217;t say they are.  They will however whoop on a lot of Mustangs and 300C based cars at the track.  So muscle car or not, you still lost to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StickShiftRick</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78208</link>
		<dc:creator>StickShiftRick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78208</guid>
		<description>*more more = more power
typing error</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*more more = more power<br />
typing error</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StickShiftRick</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78207</link>
		<dc:creator>StickShiftRick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78207</guid>
		<description>Spursgt, not one of those cars you mentioned is a sports car--not one. Porsche Cayman, Chevrolet Corvette, Ariel Atom, Ferrari F430, BMW M Coupe/Roadster... those are sports cars. You have... a sporty car at best... perhaps a &quot;sports sedan&quot; if you want to stretch and dilute the title. But please my friend, Toyota Avalon&#039;s and RAV-4 put out more more, so the mere fact that it has a supercharger is hardly a qualifier (and even worse being that it&#039;s your only one) to warrant it being labeled a sports car.

Putting rear seats in a &quot;sports car&quot; no longer makes it a sports car, but a GT car; it&#039;s as simple as that. Rear seats compromise performance (through weight and size) in the name of passenger space--that&#039;s not very sports car-like at all, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spursgt, not one of those cars you mentioned is a sports car&#8211;not one. Porsche Cayman, Chevrolet Corvette, Ariel Atom, Ferrari F430, BMW M Coupe/Roadster&#8230; those are sports cars. You have&#8230; a sporty car at best&#8230; perhaps a &#8220;sports sedan&#8221; if you want to stretch and dilute the title. But please my friend, Toyota Avalon&#8217;s and RAV-4 put out more more, so the mere fact that it has a supercharger is hardly a qualifier (and even worse being that it&#8217;s your only one) to warrant it being labeled a sports car.</p>
<p>Putting rear seats in a &#8220;sports car&#8221; no longer makes it a sports car, but a GT car; it&#8217;s as simple as that. Rear seats compromise performance (through weight and size) in the name of passenger space&#8211;that&#8217;s not very sports car-like at all, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spursgt</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78206</link>
		<dc:creator>spursgt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78206</guid>
		<description>ok...i own a 02 grand prix GT, and i think there sweet rides, not because there muscle cars...but i do consider it a sports car, because the GTP sports the supercharged 3.8, why would they offer a supercharger if they didnt intend for them to be raced?!  I think a car that was made before 1980, RWD, and has a v8 should only be considered a v8.....but i do consider it to be a sports car...for someone to say its not a sports car just because its FWD and its a four-door....has to wake up and lookk around cause they must have 4gotten that most sports cars nowadays are four doors
-Dodge Charger SRT-8
-Pontiac G8 GXP
-Chrysler 300C SRT-8
-Cadillac CTS~V
-Dodge Magnum 300 SRT-8
-Pontiac Grand Prix GXP
and although i hate imports, these cars are considered sports cars even though they also sport the four doors that the american cars do
-Subaru Impreza WRX STI
-Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII
-Lexus IS~F</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok&#8230;i own a 02 grand prix GT, and i think there sweet rides, not because there muscle cars&#8230;but i do consider it a sports car, because the GTP sports the supercharged 3.8, why would they offer a supercharger if they didnt intend for them to be raced?!  I think a car that was made before 1980, RWD, and has a v8 should only be considered a v8&#8230;..but i do consider it to be a sports car&#8230;for someone to say its not a sports car just because its FWD and its a four-door&#8230;.has to wake up and lookk around cause they must have 4gotten that most sports cars nowadays are four doors<br />
-Dodge Charger SRT-8<br />
-Pontiac G8 GXP<br />
-Chrysler 300C SRT-8<br />
-Cadillac CTS~V<br />
-Dodge Magnum 300 SRT-8<br />
-Pontiac Grand Prix GXP<br />
and although i hate imports, these cars are considered sports cars even though they also sport the four doors that the american cars do<br />
-Subaru Impreza WRX STI<br />
-Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII<br />
-Lexus IS~F</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78205</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78205</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Ricks very informative and rather lengthy argument about the gxp not being a muscle car. i own a 2000 grand prix and a 97 blown trans am and there is a significant difference in just the feel and performance of the car. The Trans am just has an aggressive stance and feels powerful whereas the grand prix doesnt now granted the new grand prix does have the horsepower it doesnt have the presence of a muscle car to me. think cadillac cts-v with the new corvette engine, fast yes, comfy and luxurious yes, meets 4 door needs with v8 performance yes, is it muscle no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Ricks very informative and rather lengthy argument about the gxp not being a muscle car. i own a 2000 grand prix and a 97 blown trans am and there is a significant difference in just the feel and performance of the car. The Trans am just has an aggressive stance and feels powerful whereas the grand prix doesnt now granted the new grand prix does have the horsepower it doesnt have the presence of a muscle car to me. think cadillac cts-v with the new corvette engine, fast yes, comfy and luxurious yes, meets 4 door needs with v8 performance yes, is it muscle no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78204</guid>
		<description>This is more of a sports car, not a muscle car. Nice and all, but not a muscle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is more of a sports car, not a muscle car. Nice and all, but not a muscle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/02/23/cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-the-2005-08-pontiac-grand-prix-gxp/comment-page-2/#comment-78203</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=11411#comment-78203</guid>
		<description>its fast as hell thats for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its fast as hell thats for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

