Showroom Showdown or Caption Contest?

Evil65Cutlass
Feb 27, 2009 at 6:16 pm

HiStyle, we think alot alike!

Mike
Feb 26, 2009 at 6:27 am

300C SRT8: Hey your kinda cute, wanna go out?!

Toyota Prius: I dont date guzzlers!

retroman
Feb 25, 2009 at 6:51 pm

I’d rather shred rubber!!

NobiZero
Feb 25, 2009 at 3:16 pm

On the left, Ron Jeremy. On the right, 40 year old virgin.

Brett
Feb 25, 2009 at 2:16 pm

Tire shredder .vs. EPA pleaser

HiStyle
Feb 24, 2009 at 5:46 pm

300!

You can say what you will, Chrysler has some really hot cars and some really great things in the pipeline. The new 2010 300 is spot on and from the sounds of it the new Charger will be just as big and mean as ever. AND it’s looking like the 200 concept is the direction of the the next Seabring. Detractors can hate all they want but Chrysler has some really great cars out right now and some good things in the pipeline… Looking at the Chrysler booth in Chicago I can tell you no other car (Camaro included) had the fan following and fingerprints from people molesting it as the Dodge Challenger. The thing Chrysler has done with cars like the 300 and Challenger is evoke emotion. All companies create misses (azteck *cough cough*) but I can’t wait to play with the NEW 300 next year!

Jeremy
Feb 24, 2009 at 5:42 pm

I second that Brian.
For me theres no comparison. It’s a nice car thats a blast to drive or just ride in with a friend (that was a fun night) vs. the last car i would want to drive because i wouldn’t want to take the chance of being seen as a liberal tree-hugging hippie.
But i mean think about it, for a car person it isn’t really much of a choice, a fun car vs. a purely functional car…300 hands down.

Brian
Feb 24, 2009 at 5:20 pm

Josh -
Retro vs. Modern – the 300C is often described to have a retro style, while the Prius is modern.
Red State vs. Blue State – One car is red, one is blue. Also, Red States (republican) are generally more traditional and blue more liberal/progressive/whatever. 300c is traditional, Prius (hybrid) is “progressive.”
Past vs. Future – Big horsepower gas engines are often looked at as a thing of the past nowadays, while hybrids are considered the future.

cknarf
Feb 24, 2009 at 4:30 pm

I think it’s more of a dignity vs. economy thing….

MoparRob07
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:53 pm

To each their own, but give me big and bold! I’ll gladly take the 300!

Robb
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:53 pm

How ’bout – Hot vs Not

FordRulesAll
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47 pm

Even though Chrysler isn’t doing well, and I’m not really a Chrysler fan, I feel embarrassed for the SRT-8 to have to sit next to a Prius.

Chris J
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:27 pm

lol. CC.

Jack
Feb 24, 2009 at 11:56 am

the way things are looking i rather have a prius

Evan
Feb 24, 2009 at 11:48 am

This is what happens when you leave the Chrysler out in the Sun too long.

Dhillaz
Feb 24, 2009 at 10:56 am

Pokemon Red vs. Pokemon Blue!

louis
Feb 24, 2009 at 10:23 am

lame vs lamer?

valek
Feb 24, 2009 at 10:10 am

Chris is right.

Josh
Feb 24, 2009 at 9:58 am

I don’t get it. Retro vs. Modern? There’s nothing retro about this 300. Non-union built is one reason why foreign car companies are flourishing. V8 and inline 4 are incomparable. What’s with the red state/blue state? There’s no past or future depicted here, it’s all the present day. They’re both passenger cars, so they’re both functional, one is built lighter for going long distances using as little fuel as possible = cheaper at the pump (approx. $20), while the other is a heavey gas guzzler = bigger gas tank = expensive at the pump (approx. $35-$40). I also noticed there was no mention of the name ‘Prius’ in the paragraph.

Chris
Feb 24, 2009 at 9:32 am

Heaven vs. Hell. Think about it…

Mac
Feb 24, 2009 at 9:22 am

HP (horsepower) vs. PP (Putt Putt)