«   CarDomain Blog Home   »

March 2, 2009

CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot: the 1965 – 67 AMC Rambler Marlin

By Jim Brennan

UDMan

Welcome to the CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot, a regular feature which aims to expand the notion of what a muscle car is, and have some fun in the process. AMC was created in 1954 after merging two independent car companies, Nash and Hudson. The company was struggling right after the merger, until they did away will all traces of the old companies, and created the Rambler compact line of cars. They were dependable, but not really exciting cars. That was about to change with the introduction of the 1965 Marlin.

Continue reading after the jump!

“Unique” best described the AMC Marlin since there was nothing else quite like it on the road when it debuted in 1965. AMC decided to enter the youth oriented segment of the market with the Marlin, a vehicle that could best be classified as an intermediate sports sedan. Dick Teague is responsible for this radical fastback design which evolved from a prototype known as the Tarpon. The AMC Marlin was introduced in early February of 1965 and offered at a base price of $3100. It was in dealer show rooms in March of 1965.


The Original Tarpon Concept

The Marlin and sat atop a 118-inch wheelbase, and was given a base price of $3100. During its introductory year, 10,327 examples were sold. There were many options available making the vehicle customizable to the users desires. The options ranged from engine and transmission choices, to air conditioning, AM/FM radio, power windows, and more. The vehicle was equipped with four-piston front disc brakes and non-servo type rear drums. A three-speed manual gearbox came standard, with an optional automatic. A wide range of interior and exterior colors allowed even further customization. The top performing Marlin featured a 287 cubic-inch V8 that managed to produce almost 200 HP, but a Four Speed Stick was not offered.

It may have been a fastback coupe, but the roofline was high to accommodate extra headroom for rear passengers. Fourteen inch steel wheels and Marlin wheel covers accented the two-color paint scheme and chrome trim.

Not much changed for the 1966 version of the Marlin. A new grill was placed on the front, the Rambler logos was removed, and a few extra options became available. The big news was in the engine department, a 327 cubic-inch V8 became available, produced 250 horsepower (270 HP has been reported in some cases), and making it a competitor with the Mustang and the Barracuda. Performance could be increased further with the new optional four-speed manual gearbox. Unfortunately, the drum brakes were now standard on the front but the disc brakes could still be had for an additional cost. The base price was lowered to around $2600, but AMC was unable to capture the sales that it had achieved in the prior year. Sales had dipped by more than half to 4,547.

In 1967, the Marlin was redesigned. It borrowed design cues from the Ambassador, including the vertical dual headlights, V-profile grille, and parking and turn signal lights. It was even placed on the Ambassador’s chassis increasing its size in all directions; The length grew by six and one-half inches, the wheelbase by six inches, and the width by four inches.

The interior received new bucket seats and an overall increase in hip and shoulder room. The interior was outfitted with power windows and cruise control as standard equipment, a rarity for cars at the time. Due to the increase in size, larger engines could be placed under the hood, including an all new 343 cubic-inch V8, making up to 290 HP.

Car and Driver performed a road test (along with the 1967 Dodge Charger) and recorded 0 to 60 times in 9.6 seconds, while producing 1/4 mile times at 17.6 seconds and achieving 82 MPH. Respectable? I’m not so sure. The corresponding Charger, with a 383 V8 did 0 to 60 in 8.9 seconds, and did the 1/4 mile in 16.5 seconds while achieving 86 MPH.

Sadly, even with all these changes, sales still were slow. In 1967, only 2,545 units were sold. You see, AMC was about to introduce the Javelin for 1968, along with one of the legendary performance cars, the AMX.


The 1965 Marlin graced the cover of the 1995 Band of Susans Here Comes Success CD

There is but one AMC Marlin within the CarDomain community, and it’s rather rough, therefore, I will not be showcasing that ride here. Now for the main question; Is the AMC Marlin an obscure Muscle Car, or is it just another dependable, unexciting Rambler that happens to look different? Remember, AMC used the basic structure of this car to produce the Javelin and the AMX, but enough of what I say, what do you think?

Comments

wsbob
Mar 11, 2009 at 12:45 am

This car isn’t a muscle car like an 80′s Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme isn’t a muscle car

GTwildfire
Mar 4, 2009 at 7:44 pm

I remember seeing these on the roads waaaaaay back in the day. They were rare back then and really rare now.

Jim Brennan
Mar 3, 2009 at 3:33 am

To Mr. AudiobahnV8SHO, You have your car male wrong. While the 65 – 67 Marlin were fastback designs, AMC introduced a new fastback design in 1974 (and went through 1978), and it was a Matador. Different car, different engines, different era. But don’t worry, there’s a posting on that car doming.

MikeMedico406
Mar 2, 2009 at 7:46 pm

Hum….something is a little fishy. Looks alot like the Dodge Charger of the day. It was probably a great driving car at the time, and fast for the Money spent, but very ugly. I also say no.

AudiobahnV8SHO
Mar 2, 2009 at 3:28 pm

Remember the one from “Man with the golden gun”? They can fly too!

retroman
Mar 2, 2009 at 3:03 pm

Um… Like most AMCs, it’s looks are unique, that’s for sure. That c-pillar really stands out like a sore thumb, and are those a slight hint of fins on the back? I think they were trying for the futurama thing to no avail, but I must give them credit for making the ’67 model less obtrusive. As far as being a true muscle car, the Marlin is considerably slower than its competitors, so I don’t think so, but one could be modified to produce the extra grunt needed.

Post a comment

Please login to CarDomain to post a comment.