1971 Challenger Convertible 440 Six Pack 4×4 For Sale

chinacargps
Jan 3, 2010 at 7:30 pm

I can’t say any words.

nailheadleadfoot
Mar 23, 2009 at 9:58 pm

all the tubes should go,other than that,i guess it’s versitile for just about anything,besides,i’ve always said,if you got your ride that high,it should be 4 wheel drive.

juniortrooper
Mar 21, 2009 at 5:58 pm

i think that is the worst way to do up a challenger.

lifeonacloud
Mar 21, 2009 at 3:06 pm

It’s neat I guess, but what a waste of a amazing car.

Tranquil
Mar 20, 2009 at 8:48 am

Haha that’s awesome! Don’t like convertible though ><, love it

alexisonfire_50
Mar 20, 2009 at 8:38 am

Fucking gay, what a waste of a nice car.

pttransamdriver
Mar 20, 2009 at 5:32 am

Dodge=Fail lol

chevyman327nova
Mar 20, 2009 at 4:17 am

it was done when they were’nt that rare so they didnt think they were hurting anything besides take off the shitty fender flares and the stupid extra tube bumpers and it would look good and the price is too high

sabreleaf
Mar 19, 2009 at 10:15 pm

Dumb then and now. It would take alot of money putting that back. Have to buy the entire suspension. Trying to sell it for the price of non jackass car. I mean jacked up car.

Dart_Doctor
Mar 19, 2009 at 9:41 pm

i dont know why u guys are hateing for bout 2grand it can be back stock and it was done when the Challengers every where and u could pick one up used for bout 1500 i think what thay are asking for it is to much but ya later

carguyinoklahoma
Mar 19, 2009 at 9:01 pm

LMAO, the headline says asking 69K and the add says asking 79K. I hope thats a package deal with the house plus the dog.
Then “needed something to haul his 30′ ciggarette boat with” Hmmmm, wonder how that worked out with the wheel base of a blazer. LMAO, a fool and their money soon will part…….

cbosley1
Mar 19, 2009 at 7:58 pm

hey nothin is wrong with it it looks awsome….but it is to high of a price.

Btimbit
Mar 19, 2009 at 7:08 pm

Kinda cool. Wouldn’t buy it though

baller247365
Mar 19, 2009 at 3:29 pm

and you people say donks are ugly

Nissan63
Mar 19, 2009 at 2:02 pm

That needs sanded down and given a nice cammo paint job. Then it would be perfect.

WilliamPanik
Mar 19, 2009 at 1:24 pm

I don’t care if it was done 20 years ago or not, this is a waste of a Challenger.. My Mustang isn’t worth that much right now either but I would never dream of doing anything like this to it.. But since what’s done is done, I’d take it

LDKVR6
Mar 19, 2009 at 12:16 pm

$69 for this? I’m so glad I didn’t get rid of my Jetta.
Some one was on crak when they decided to build this car into a pile of Sh…Shut yo mouth!

95BlckFirebird
Mar 19, 2009 at 10:56 am

what ever, glad they didnt do it to a firebird trans am lol

DODGE-GIRL
Mar 19, 2009 at 10:22 am

pretty sweet if you ask me

kaotik_inc
Mar 19, 2009 at 10:05 am

Restore it to original, then I might briefly consider the $69,000 price tag…. Very briefly…. Then I’ll still LMAO!
What are you smokin’?
$69,000? Good drugs…. All I gotta say. LOL
$6900 I could see… Maybe pull a solid $25,000 if you restore it to original, but not like that.
Cool car, sad owner LOL

Rev15
Mar 19, 2009 at 8:51 am

Only $69,000!!! I wouldn’t pay 10k for it. with 69k I would buy a Z and modified the crap out of it!

Moparmaniac07
Mar 19, 2009 at 5:55 am

and it was only a 318, so it still wouldn’t be a six figure car if it was in original condition

DJs-zj360
Mar 19, 2009 at 5:47 am

Surly two of those 0′s are typos, right?

JDeegs
Mar 19, 2009 at 5:39 am

this thing is sick looking. I don’t understand why everyone is getting mad over it if this thing was done 20 years ago when challengers weren’t worth much to begin with. I have a 70′ Challenger and hell no i wouldn’t do that to my car but it’s definatly not a waste of a car like everyone’s saying

yotaking22
Mar 19, 2009 at 4:45 am

DAMN.. 69,000 ARE YOU SHITIN ME?? I CAN THROW A 10 INCH LIFT ON A FERRARI AND SELL IT FOR A MILL.. LOL

nissanhksking99
Mar 19, 2009 at 3:57 am

this is what happens when people get bored.

FEELINGFRESH
Mar 18, 2009 at 11:07 pm

Damn why

86Iroc-z
Mar 18, 2009 at 10:19 pm

looks like the work was done right but man why waste a challenger for that makes me sad =(

Serj22
Mar 18, 2009 at 9:05 pm

The underkit of the Ramcharger does it no justice. And I still think “Ramcharger” was the coolest name for a car ever. I’ve seen other projects like this, but the Convertible Challenger doesn’t work for it.

fortyfordsedan
Mar 18, 2009 at 8:56 pm

The workmanship looks very nice, but it still makes me want to cry. Not only is it a Challenger, its a convertible too.

cmonlunchbox
Mar 18, 2009 at 8:27 pm

That thing is fuckin bad ass. I’m not a fan of things such as this, but if i had more money than i knew what to do with, i’d buy it, and a case of beer, grow out my mullet then go muddin shitfaced.

Devious505
Mar 18, 2009 at 7:52 pm

this guy did a wonderful job messing up a sick ass challanger

codylee6969
Mar 18, 2009 at 7:28 pm

i like the dog

ford72271
Mar 18, 2009 at 7:23 pm

What th’,who th’, how th’ ! Ridiculous!!!!

1988montecarloss
Mar 18, 2009 at 6:16 pm

that man should be shot

retroman
Mar 18, 2009 at 4:52 pm

It may be a 20 year old job, but you don’t see too many other 60s muscle cars that got turned into 4x4s in the 80s. I can normally appreciate a marraige like this because it’s different, but this one is overdoing it.

Nytros_Finder
Mar 18, 2009 at 4:40 pm

Like everyone else said…. GREAT JOB SCREWING UP A NICE CAR!

I do give ya props for the creativity though…. bet it would beat my friends jeep….

19CAMARO85
Mar 18, 2009 at 4:26 pm

the car looks good but the 4×4 kills it.

99blaz
Mar 18, 2009 at 4:23 pm

its pretty sick but it makes me sad to see a car like that turned into a 4×4

whtfocus77
Mar 18, 2009 at 3:20 pm

waste of a beutiful challenger

Sharpie1
Mar 18, 2009 at 11:45 am

it looks like crap, but I bet you that body could easily sit atop a nice tube frame with coil-overs and an IRS

TheMaro82
Mar 18, 2009 at 9:54 am

Well, i would choose my 4×4 camaro over this any day i just dont like the bumpers or even the fender flares, i think i might offer $70,000 for mine lol jk

Resurrected_Z28
Mar 18, 2009 at 9:39 am

I agree with Brett Powers, how could anyone do this to that car? Dont you know how much it would be worth if it wasn’t in this condition.

Brett Powers
Mar 18, 2009 at 8:48 am

Good job, you ruined a beatiful car.

Tcassa
Mar 18, 2009 at 8:45 am

Actually looks in good condition. I wouldn’t buy it, but it’s certainty interesting.

bradjolly
Mar 18, 2009 at 8:27 am

i wonder what the dukes of hazard would have been like if they had this car instead.

Frdbrnk408
Mar 18, 2009 at 8:27 am

How much for the dog? I could probably afford that!

Moparmaniac07
Mar 18, 2009 at 8:22 am

I’d drive it

Oafman
Mar 18, 2009 at 7:57 am

They must not take that off road much. I can see a 4×4 muscle car but a 4×4 convertible? That is just a waste. If you are going to make something silly at least make it useful.