

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Looks Better? The 2005 or 2010 Mustang?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rusty6174</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84319</link>
		<dc:creator>rusty6174</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84319</guid>
		<description>I like the 05-09&#039;s better because they are older looking.   The 10&#039; lost some of the retro look.  The rear end is jacked up and the overall height of the car bugs me.  It&#039;s hard to describe, but one picture I saw with them side by side showed that the new body is much thicker from rocker to roof.  By the way, Dodge struck out with the Challenger design in my opinion.  It is way too heavy and they didn&#039;t even offer a stick.  This in itself tells me that it is not a true muscle car.  The 05&#039; Mustangs are faster than the 09&#039; Challenger.  That&#039;s embarrassing.  It&#039;s just a bunch of hype.  The same will happen when the Camaro is released and the Mustang will have to put it in it&#039;s place at the back of the line again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the 05-09&#8242;s better because they are older looking.   The 10&#8242; lost some of the retro look.  The rear end is jacked up and the overall height of the car bugs me.  It&#8217;s hard to describe, but one picture I saw with them side by side showed that the new body is much thicker from rocker to roof.  By the way, Dodge struck out with the Challenger design in my opinion.  It is way too heavy and they didn&#8217;t even offer a stick.  This in itself tells me that it is not a true muscle car.  The 05&#8242; Mustangs are faster than the 09&#8242; Challenger.  That&#8217;s embarrassing.  It&#8217;s just a bunch of hype.  The same will happen when the Camaro is released and the Mustang will have to put it in it&#8217;s place at the back of the line again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FordRulesAll</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84318</link>
		<dc:creator>FordRulesAll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84318</guid>
		<description>Also the whole thing with the rear end of the 2010, have any of you seen one in person? Really when you see it in person it&#039;s not bad at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also the whole thing with the rear end of the 2010, have any of you seen one in person? Really when you see it in person it&#8217;s not bad at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FordRulesAll</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84317</link>
		<dc:creator>FordRulesAll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84317</guid>
		<description>I agree with Tcassa and WilliamPanik.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tcassa and WilliamPanik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Team61RaceCars</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84316</link>
		<dc:creator>Team61RaceCars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84316</guid>
		<description>The 2010&#039;s grill area looks like a cross between the new Challenger and Camaro. It&#039;s getting narrow and sharp edged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2010&#8242;s grill area looks like a cross between the new Challenger and Camaro. It&#8217;s getting narrow and sharp edged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moparmaniac07</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84315</link>
		<dc:creator>Moparmaniac07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84315</guid>
		<description>the &#039;99 beetle wasn&#039;t retro, it was a restyle, the &#039;98 beetles were pretty much the same as since they started making them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the &#8217;99 beetle wasn&#8217;t retro, it was a restyle, the &#8217;98 beetles were pretty much the same as since they started making them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84314</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84314</guid>
		<description>I like the 2010 Front end and the 2005 tail lights. And about the whole going retro thing, well we could take it from the top. VW I think was the first with the &#039;99 Beetle followed by Mopar with the Prowler and PT Cruiser, then Ford ran away with it with the &#039;02 T-bird, Ford GT, and the Mustang of course. Chevy meanwhile developed the HHR the SSR, and I almost forgot that we also got a new Mini Cooper shipped in from across the pond. I hope the retro trend goes on for quite awhile. I like seeing everyone try to out do each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the 2010 Front end and the 2005 tail lights. And about the whole going retro thing, well we could take it from the top. VW I think was the first with the &#8217;99 Beetle followed by Mopar with the Prowler and PT Cruiser, then Ford ran away with it with the &#8217;02 T-bird, Ford GT, and the Mustang of course. Chevy meanwhile developed the HHR the SSR, and I almost forgot that we also got a new Mini Cooper shipped in from across the pond. I hope the retro trend goes on for quite awhile. I like seeing everyone try to out do each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeCool97Formula</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84313</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeCool97Formula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84313</guid>
		<description>2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Killersharq</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84312</link>
		<dc:creator>Killersharq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84312</guid>
		<description>New one&#039;s nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New one&#8217;s nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ___nes___</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84311</link>
		<dc:creator>___nes___</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84311</guid>
		<description>2010 FTW!!! I just love the new grill/headlights! Those fog lights on the &#039;05 are too much for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 FTW!!! I just love the new grill/headlights! Those fog lights on the &#8217;05 are too much for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olds68</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/03/26/which-looks-better-the-2005-or-2010-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-84310</link>
		<dc:creator>olds68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=15221#comment-84310</guid>
		<description>I like the 2010 Stang, MUCH better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the 2010 Stang, MUCH better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

