«   CarDomain Blog Home   »

April 27, 2009

CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot: Ford Turbo Coupes, Mustang SVO, T-Bird Turbo and Merkur XR4Ti

By Jim Brennan

UDMan

Welcome to the CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot, a regular feature which aims to expand the notion of what a muscle car is, and to throw all conventional thinking out the window while we’re at it. This time, instead of highlighting one obscure piece of muscle, I thought it was time to review a new type of muscular performance car, offered in three distinct flavors, all from the Ford Motor Company during the 80s. Instead of using V8 power, these cars were equipped with a snorting, growling, turbocharged 4 cylinder engine, with outstanding handling, and monochromatic good looks. Let’s look at Ford’s attempt to re-invent the muscle car, with the Ford Mustang SVO, the Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, and the Merkur XR4Ti.

Continue reading after the jump!

The Mustang SVO was a limited-production version of the Ford Mustang sold from 1984 to 1986, during which time it was the fastest, most expensive version of the Mustang available. Ford began to make a major push forward with the Mustang in 1982, and it involved a newly formed division within Ford, the Special Vehicle Operations, or SVO. Tasked with developing something that was both plainly American and competent to compete with entry-level European sports cars of the day, the SVO team went to work on the new Mustang, deeming that it was the most obvious choice as a platform basis for a high-performance vehicle.

Concerned with issues such as fuel consumption and emissions, SVO engineers opted to pass over the venerable Boss 302 in lieu of an updated, turbocharged, and stronger version of Ford’s 2.3 liter inline four, originally used in the Pinto. An advanced, computer controlled fuel injection system and an intercooled turbocharger system helped push power output to 175 HP for the 1984 and 85 model years. With fine tuning and the addition of a new water-cooling system, power output rose to 200 horsepower for 1986. The vehicle’s standard 5-speed manual transmission was updated, eventually receiving revised gearing and a factory installed Hurst shifter to improve feel and quickness. One of the major downfalls to the turbocharged inline four was the lack of torque in comparison to the V8, which, in the eyes of former muscle car owners, was considered a severe disadvantage.

The SVO featured several key modifications over the standard Mustang to help increase performance. The front suspension geometry was modified, a 15:1 ratio power-assisted rack-and-pinion steering system replaced the standard system, a limited slip 7.5″ Traction-Lok axle was added for the first year of production, a ventilated four-wheel-disc braking system replaced the GT’s disc/drum setup, and a complete Koni suspension system featuring specially tuned adjustable struts, shocks, and horizontal dampers replaced the setup used on the Mustang GT. Five-lug, 16 × 7 inch aluminum wheels wearing P225-16 Goodyear Eagle VR 50 “Gatorback” tires were standard. The rear disc brakes, the five lug hubs, the sixteen inch wheels, the quad-shock rear end, and the Konis were used on the SVO before any other Mustang.

Interior features included adjustable sport seats with lumbar supports, a leather-wrapped tilt steering wheel, shift lever, and emergency brake handle, power windows, door locks, A/C and a premium stereo system. Most of these options weren’t normally found on small American coupes at that time. However, an optional Competition Prep package deleted many of those features to save weight. The exterior had a unique front grill that was only used on the SVO line, and a biplane spoiler that was also unique to the SVO.

The SVO was an enthusiast’s dream come true. Handling was near-neutral, cornering flat and undramatic, steering direct and properly weighted, braking swift and sure. Performance? Exhilarating for the day, with 0-60 mph in about 7.5 seconds, the quarter-mile in just under 16 seconds at around 90 mph, and top speed between 135 and 145 mph, depending on what model year.


The Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, was the top-of-the-line model, and was special for several reasons. It used a turbocharged 4-cylinder 2.3 L engine with Ford’s EEC-IV electronic engine control system. Unlike the other models, the Turbo Coupe came with a standard 5-speed manual transmission. Other improvements included a limited-slip Traction-Lok differential, larger tires and wheels, and a sportier interior complete with analog gauges. By 1985, the Turbo Coupe gained power to 155 horsepower, and all models received a new interior.

The Turbo Coupe earned the honor of being the Motor Trend Car of the Year for 1987. The 2.3 L turbo-4 now included the air-to-air intercooler that was found in the Ford Mustang SVO and boosted power up to 190 horsepower for the 5-speed manual transmission. New for the Turbo Coupe was a 4-speed automatic, with which the engine was rated at 150 horsepower. The automatic had a reduced turbo boost of 9.5 psi instead of 10 to 15 psi, for “transmission durability” reasons. The Turbo Coupe also came with anti-lock 4-wheel disc brakes, Automatic Ride Control, and 16-inch 225/60VR performance tires.

On the appearance side, the Turbo Coupe received a performance hood with operational dual hood scoops with air ducts to the intercooler. The Turbo Coupe also featured a performance-styled front valance with fog lights, as well as “Snowflake” 16 inch alloy wheels. In 1988, the final year for the Turbo Coupe, there were only minor changes. The 5-speed manual transmission now allowed the full 15 psi of boost in all forward gears (as opposed to excluding the first two gears).

Roundly applauded by “buff books” and even Consumer Guide®, the Turbo Coupe was a bit crude mechanically, but the most-roadable T-Bird anyone could remember. It was quick, too: 0-60 mph took 9.6 seconds, with the 1/4 Mile taking 16.5 seconds @ 85 mph, and a top speed of 142 MPH.


The Merkur XR4Ti was a short-lived United States and Canada-market version of the European Ford Sierra XR4i. It was the brainchild of then Ford Vice President Bob Lutz. It was sold in the US from 1985 to 1989. It was the first vehicle of Ford’s Merkur range, followed in 1988 by the Merkur Scorpio. Ford had hopes of importing its top European models under this brand, including the Sierra Sapphire but the venture was ultimately unsuccessful due to branding issues, increasing exchange rates, general poor marketing tactics and the pending safety regulations that would have increased retooling and production costs.

The XR4Ti was distinguished mechanically by its turbocharged Ford Lima 2.3 L 4-cylinder SOHC engine and independent rear suspension, and stylistically by its large bi-plane spoiler (replaced in later years with a single rear spoiler). It came with either the C3 3-speed automatic transmission or the Ford Type 9, 5-speed manual transmission. Many felt it resembled the Ford Escort RS at the time, although the two were built on different platforms. Mechanically, it differed from the European Ford Sierra XR4i, which had a 2.9l Ford Cologne V6.

The 2.3 liter turbocharged, fuel injected engine uses an EEC-IV computer. The 4-cylinder engine was generally rated at 145 hp (108 kW) when mated with an automatic transmission, and 175 hp when matched with the 5-speed manual transmission. This engine weighs a surprising 450 lb in full (turbo) trim. This engine is basically the same as that found in the SVO Mustang and the Thunderbird Turbo Coupe of the time, though the SVO Mustang and Thunderbird Turbo Coupe differed by having an intercooler and better EEC-IV programming.

The top speed of the manual transmission XR4Ti 1985-87 is 130 mph. The bi-plane rear spoiler was changed to a single spoiler for the 1988-1989 cars, with unexpected consequences, as it actually increased the drag coefficient compared to the bi-plane spoiler of the earlier cars.

Car & Driver tests for the XR4Ti reported 0-60 mph times from 7 seconds flat and as high 7.9 seconds and 1/4 mile times at around 15.7 seconds. Later tests by Car & Driver showed 7.8 seconds for the 0-60mph times and they mentioned the press car might have been a ringer which was common at the time. In their test data, they initially stated the car came with a limited slip differential which was a misprint, at the time there were no LSD’s available in either the American Merkur XR4Ti or its sister car the Europe-only XR4i. Car & Driver at one time placed the XR4Ti on their 10 best list, only to later issue a blistering article in which they apologized to their readers for doing so, and in essence, rescinded the award.

CarDomain Members Rides

There are quite a few of these Ford Turbo Coupes within the CarDomain community, so let’s take a look at a few. First up, it’s John’s Black SVO, from Smithtown, NY. In John’s own words, the car is on the “to be restored” list, but he sports two other ‘Stangs. Take a look at his ride page, and leave a comment.

Here’s another beautiful Black SVO, owned by Ryan Wentzel, from Sioux Falls, SD. It’s a great looking SVO, with a lot of upgrades, so go over and take a look. There are over 35 more Mustang SVO’s within the community, but let’s move on.

Take a look at Kevin’s ‘86 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, from Toronto. It’s all stock except for the aftermarket wheels, and K & N filters. Nice Bird!

Here’s Brad’s 1988 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, from Swanton, Ohio, with a lot of mileage. Still looks great, and none the worse for wear. Take a look and leave Brad a shout out! There are at least 2 Dozen other Thunderbird Turbo Coupes within the community, but again, we have one last ride to check out.

Look what we have here, it’s Eric’s Black XR4Ti, hailing from Southern California. One of the images above features his car, so take a look at his ride page, and leave Eric a comment!

Here’s Wyatt’s glistening white Merkur XR4Ti, from Seattle. A beautiful car that has some extensive modifications. Take a look, and see if you agree. There are over 250 other XR4Ti’s in the community, and they can all be seen here.

The question remains, can any of these “new age” Fords be classified as a “Muscle Car”? They have the Horsepower, at least for their time. They handled better than any previous “Muscle Car”, but does that really matter? And while the Mustang isn’t really Obscure, the other two surely qualify for that title. What do you, the readers think? Do they belong in the parking lot, or should they be just ignored? I look forward to hearing from each and every one!

Comments

The CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parkling Lot Year End Wrap-Up: The 80’s when Muscle Returned – CarDomain Blog
Jan 4, 2010 at 10:17 am

[...] the NASCAR high speed tracks. – The 1983-84 Ford LTD LX, a Mustang 5.0 with four doors! – The 1984-86 Ford Mustang SVO, a new wave performance car – The 1984-88 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, with a screaming four [...]

GoudyStyle
Aug 26, 2009 at 8:30 am

I think the SVO was a great Idea, Ahead of its time too.

1988montecarloss
May 5, 2009 at 11:36 am

KrashingV8
Apr 28, 2009 at 5:23 pm

I remember a couple yrs back a guy in texas had his 4 banger mustang gt turbo in modified mustang profiled. it was a budget built mustang for around 3 grand. he was hitting i think 600 horse out of that 2.3 because the engine block was cast iron and could handle i think 40 lbs of boost and he was using a turbo from a dodge ram diesel, a tranny from a tbird supercoupe and everything else was custom. id say these little cars were muscle.”
~
~
~
that is 100% bullshit

Alex Vickers
Apr 28, 2009 at 7:45 pm

I love that first Thunderbird. I wasn’t too big of a fan of that bodystyle, but seeing it now makes me want one so bad…

KrashingV8
Apr 28, 2009 at 5:23 pm

I remember a couple yrs back a guy in texas had his 4 banger mustang gt turbo in modified mustang profiled. it was a budget built mustang for around 3 grand. he was hitting i think 600 horse out of that 2.3 because the engine block was cast iron and could handle i think 40 lbs of boost and he was using a turbo from a dodge ram diesel, a tranny from a tbird supercoupe and everything else was custom. id say these little cars were muscle.

retroman
Apr 28, 2009 at 2:51 pm

Love the write up Jim. I have to agree that the Ford turbo coupes be on the list. I also don’t want to sound like I’m trying to get my car on your blog, but is there any chance you’ll be doing a write up on the Chrysler turbo K-cars?? I really think they need to be up there. If you want to talk about obscure muscle, I don’t think it gets any more obscure than what Shelby created with Mopar. Just look at the price differences between the Ford and Chrysler Shelbys, and I’m sure you know that cars like the GLHS, CSX Shadow, and the Spirit R/T are still giving alot of other guys a run for thier money.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mC9QKZ5F9c
And if you’ve ever tried doing a burnout with a base model Spirit, it’s useless, even on wet pavement. The R/T is a different story.

carguy1215
Apr 28, 2009 at 8:00 am

I’m going with, no, they’re not muscle cars. They’re sports cars, especially the Merkur. Muscle cars should have a V8 and there are very few exceptions, the only one I can think of being the Buick GNX. These cars were designed more as sports cars to compete with European cars than to compete with other muscle cars.

AshtnSkt
Apr 28, 2009 at 4:14 am

does anyone know where i can get a turbo 2.3 cause i cant find one anywhere

Richter-Scale
Apr 28, 2009 at 3:16 am

Wow

RED_RUM_N_BUD
Apr 28, 2009 at 12:05 am

hey austin that vid u posted was from 1320 video… and if i remmber corectly the white car was a corvet

95BlckFirebird
Apr 27, 2009 at 7:53 pm

badd A$$!!

wsbob
Apr 27, 2009 at 6:05 pm

I’m biased cuz these are American made coupes. I love turbo. So yes to the Thunderbird, the Mustang, and I guess the Merkur too. Juss because of RWD American performance

Biggunna
Apr 27, 2009 at 5:37 pm

I know the SVO has a place in Mustangs history after all it was the predecessor to the hugely popular 87-93 Fox body. But I’m with Tcassa a muscle car has only one engine, and thats a V8

Shmak1982
Apr 27, 2009 at 2:49 pm

Jim, you may have “broken the golden rule” about keeping it short and to the point, but I enjoyed every last word. I’m a Chevy guy, so I didn’t know that the 2.3 turbo would outperform the GT. I knew they existed in the Thunder Chickens, but I didn’t know that they ever put the turbo engine in the Mustangs, so I learned a little bit in the reading. Any article that teaches me something I didn’t already know, is a good article to me, but this one was great. Keep ‘em coming.

satty12
Apr 27, 2009 at 11:06 am

Great article Jim learned a few things about ford in the 80s i didnt know and yes these deserve to be in the obscure parkinglot just simply amazing good power 2doors reardrive and a turbo hell ya i now want to find one of these gems.

Moparmaniac07
Apr 27, 2009 at 11:04 am

@ dodgethiz12
I just used a stratus because that’s what I drive

Austin, the engine is what’s not muscular about it. Chrysler made a few turbo cars with the 2.2, and they were fast as hell, but not musclecars. The daytona and spirit r/t, like retromans, put out 224 hp, ran the quarter in the 14’s, but they’re not musclecars. They have a little 135 cubic inch 4-banger, not a big axle twisting V8. And it doesn’t have to handle to be a musclecar, after all, how many meatheads are agile?
Not sayin they’re not fast, but hell who considers a lotus or an atom a musclecar? Just because it’s fast doesn’t make it a musclecar. There’s no replacement for displacement.

AudiobahnV8SHO
Apr 27, 2009 at 10:58 am

Good to hear buddy, keep em coming.

Jim Brennan
Apr 27, 2009 at 10:31 am

To AudiobahnV8SHO: The title is a little weird because I ran out of space, but you get the general idea. As far as the other Mercury’s, I have to be frank: This was an extra long post, and actually took longer than any other posting I have done to date. And I actually broke the golden rule in blogging, that is keep it short, and entertaining. But thank you for reading this, and I hope you keep reading this series. I have a few surprises like this in the coming weeks.

AudiobahnV8SHO
Apr 27, 2009 at 9:53 am

I have to agree whole heartedly with Austin. The 80’s saw alot of smaller engine muscle cars (Typhoon/Syclone, Taurus SHO, Buick GNX) You can’t bitch about this and NOT bitch about those as well guys.

As for you Jim, I must say that the title of your article is odd in my eyes because you mention the Turbo Coupe and the Tbird Turbo, that is the same car with one incorrect name thrown in there. Not to mention where is the reference to the Mercurys? The Cougar XR7s like mine and the Capri RS Turbos? I am happy to see this article about a little known Ford power plant but am disappointed with the execution. Jim, keep doing what you’re doing. You can’t please everyone.

Austin Gaddis
Apr 27, 2009 at 9:38 am

I will step up and say I agree with the article. This was the 80’s folks, and the SVO was faster than the Mustang GT with the ground pounding v8. Not only was it faster, but handled way better, and stopped way better. So, Tell me what isn’t muscular about a 4cyl turbo that can walk all over V8s in every single category(except sound)?

I would just like to add this video of a turbo 03 Cobra racing a 2.3T Mustang
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyncDceRkmo

leetcliche
Apr 27, 2009 at 9:32 am

Love the look of the xr4ti, think the Cosworth II were better cars and better looking, wish they came stateside.

___nes___
Apr 27, 2009 at 9:10 am

0-60 in 9.6? My N/A ‘97 does it in 9 seconds! Wish I still had a turbo though! hahaha

dodgethiz12
Apr 27, 2009 at 8:24 am

@ Moparmaniac07
How about the NA 2.7L V6 Dodge Stratus w/200bhp and 190ft/lb

Moparmaniac07
Apr 27, 2009 at 7:32 am

How about for the next one, try a Dodge Stratus. It’s got a NA 2.5 V6, 165 hp, a little more torque, performance comparable to these, how about it?

Tcassa
Apr 27, 2009 at 7:13 am

Always enjoy your articles Jim. Sometimes agree, sometimes disagree. This is one where I disagree. To me, a muscle car has only one engine, and that’s a V8. Regards of its make, no matter how obscure the car may be as you have perviously posted, I can only think of a muscle car as having a V8.

Either way, I am always looking forward to your articles, and the healthy discussion that comes with them. Thanks, and keep them coming.

oldscoob
Apr 27, 2009 at 6:45 am

I remember the four cyl mustang, too much lack of integrity. The v8s proved well, after strengthening them, no turbo on an inline weirdo necessary.

Post a comment

Please login to CarDomain to post a comment.