

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1967 Mustang with Retractable Hardtop on eBay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1967 Ford Mustang with Retractable Hardtop and Lambo Doors &#124; Esanmuh Cars - Pictures and Wallpapers</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-125488</link>
		<dc:creator>1967 Ford Mustang with Retractable Hardtop and Lambo Doors &#124; Esanmuh Cars - Pictures and Wallpapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-125488</guid>
		<description>[...] eBay , Via: Cardomain , Link: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eBay , Via: Cardomain , Link: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1967 Ford Mustang with Retractable Hardtop and Lambo Doors</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-115919</link>
		<dc:creator>1967 Ford Mustang with Retractable Hardtop and Lambo Doors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-115919</guid>
		<description>[...]  , Via: Cardomain , Link: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  , Via: Cardomain , Link: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1988montecarloss</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-90104</link>
		<dc:creator>1988montecarloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-90104</guid>
		<description>&quot;

NobiZero
Apr 28, 2009 at 5:34 am

Lose the late-70’s paint and overplayed Lambo Doors, and that’s actually not that bad.
&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;</p>
<p>NobiZero<br />
Apr 28, 2009 at 5:34 am</p>
<p>Lose the late-70’s paint and overplayed Lambo Doors, and that’s actually not that bad.<br />
&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 98MustangStreet</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-90103</link>
		<dc:creator>98MustangStreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-90103</guid>
		<description>one word PRETTY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one word PRETTY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILLY-Sase</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-90102</link>
		<dc:creator>ILLY-Sase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-90102</guid>
		<description>If that car had just a nice Candy apple red or Black glossy paint job...would be hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that car had just a nice Candy apple red or Black glossy paint job&#8230;would be hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggunna</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-90101</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggunna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-90101</guid>
		<description>I like the concept, yet the paint and interior are a little hard on the eyes. Something about the rims is off too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept, yet the paint and interior are a little hard on the eyes. Something about the rims is off too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarahsmile90</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-90100</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahsmile90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-90100</guid>
		<description>Sorry but that is just ridiculous. I like classic cars to keep with the &quot;classic&quot; style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but that is just ridiculous. I like classic cars to keep with the &#8220;classic&#8221; style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retroman</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-90099</link>
		<dc:creator>retroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-90099</guid>
		<description>Definitely different, and I&#039;m not usually a fan of modernizing muscle cars, but it looks ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely different, and I&#8217;m not usually a fan of modernizing muscle cars, but it looks ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOPlamborghini</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-90098</link>
		<dc:creator>TOPlamborghini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-90098</guid>
		<description>Its ok.
I dont see whats so wrong with it.
It could be ALOT worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its ok.<br />
I dont see whats so wrong with it.<br />
It could be ALOT worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernGuy8503</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/04/28/1967-mustang-with-retractable-hardtop-on-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-90097</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernGuy8503</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=17621#comment-90097</guid>
		<description>well even though i don&#039;t agree with the lambo doors you still have to respect the amount of work it took to make the hardtop for that because its not the same shape has a roof off a hardtop mustang so its not like they just made a hardtop roof bend, but they should have kept the doors stock and i understand the trunk lid having to open like that for the hardtop to go in it but they should have made the truck lid so it can also open the normal stock way, doesn&#039;t seem to hard to do just a frame for the trunk lid to rest on and it shoudl work, also i don&#039;t like the stripe colors, doesn&#039;t go with the blue/green base color at all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well even though i don&#8217;t agree with the lambo doors you still have to respect the amount of work it took to make the hardtop for that because its not the same shape has a roof off a hardtop mustang so its not like they just made a hardtop roof bend, but they should have kept the doors stock and i understand the trunk lid having to open like that for the hardtop to go in it but they should have made the truck lid so it can also open the normal stock way, doesn&#8217;t seem to hard to do just a frame for the trunk lid to rest on and it shoudl work, also i don&#8217;t like the stripe colors, doesn&#8217;t go with the blue/green base color at all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

