«   CarDomain Blog Home   »

June 4, 2009

CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot: the Turbocharged Corvair

By Jim Brennan

UDMan

Welcome to the CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot, a regular feature which aims to expand the notion of what a muscle car is, and to throw all conventional wisdom out the window. The compact Corvair, which Chevrolet introduced in 1960, had an aluminum, horizontally opposed (flat), air-cooled engine in the rear, and four-wheel independent suspension. Could this be the basis for a muscle car? Lets find out together with the Turbocharged Corvair Spyder and Corsa.

Continue reading after the jump!

Having a rear mounted, air-cooled, flat six cylinder engine, put the Corvair way out of the mainstream of an American auto industry dominated by big cars with front-mounted, cast iron V-8s driving through a solid axle. The Corvair was inspired by the top-selling German Volkswagen, and along with cars like the Ford Falcon, Chrysler (later Plymouth) Valiant and American Motors Rambler, was meant as an import fighter.

But if the Corvair wasn’t different enough already, Chevrolet took it even farther off the beaten path in 1962 when, along with Oldsmobile, it pioneered turbocharging in production automobiles. A turbocharged engine was a very radical idea during the early 60′s, but GM thought it was needed to “boost” horsepower ratings in smaller engines that had no room to grow (Like the flat-six, or the small 215 Cu.In. Oldsmobile V-8). By inserting a small turbine in the exhaust system, and using it to spin an air compressor to pump more air into the engine, significant horsepower increases can be achieved.

Some hot rodders and racers were experimenting with turbos during the 1950s, but it was not until the ’60s that they would be fitted to production cars. In the spring of 1962, both Chevrolet and Oldsmobile introduced turbocharged models. Oldsmobile put a turbo on its 215-cu. in. aluminum V-8 F-85 intermediate model and called it the “Jetfire.” The turbo increased horsepower to 215, or one horsepower per cu. in., from the best non-turbo figure of 185.

Chevrolet applied turbocharging to its Corvair to increase its power and enhance its sporting image. The Ford Falcon and the Valiant, the Corvair’s direct competitors, had conventional front-engine designs, so they could easily be fitted with larger engines. Although the Corvair’s air-cooled six could be increased in displacement from its original 140 cu. in., there were definite limits on how big it could be made. It would be increased to 145 cu. in. in 1961, and 164 cu. in. in 1964, but that’s as far as it would go during the Corvair’s 10-year life span. Chevrolet engineers therefore chose turbocharging as their route to substantially more power.

In 1962 the Corvair’s normally aspirated base engine developed 80 horsepower, or 84 when fitted with the optional “Powerglide” 2 speed automatic transmission. When the turbocharged Corvair Spyder was introduced it had 150 horsepower, or almost double the power out of the same displacement. This improved performance significantly.

Car Life magazine tested a pair of Corvairs in its August 1962 issue. One was an automatic-equipped Monza coupe with the 84-horsepower engine. They recorded a more than modest zero to 60 m.p.h. (96 km/h) time of 21.6 seconds, and a top speed of 90 (145). Then they tested a Spyder coupe, fitted with a four-speed manual transmission, this 150 horsepower turbocharged Corvair would sprint to 60 (96) in 10.8 seconds, and reach a top speed of 105 mph (170 km/h). According to the testers, the turbo completely changed the character of the car, and “puts this compact into a class by itself.” It behaved more like the Porsche 356 than anything else.

While Oldsmobile would stay with turbocharging for only a couple of years, 1962-63, before succumbing to bigger engines as the easier, less complex route to higher power, Chevrolet would keep its turbo until 1966. Horsepower of the Corvair turbo was increased to 180 in 1965. Remember, all this power from a 164 Cu. In. flat six!

Unfortunately for the Corvair, 1965 was the year in which Ralph Nader published his book Unsafe At Any Speed. In it he savaged the Corvair for alleged unsafe handling due to the rear swing axles fitted to the 1960-64 models. Ironically, by the time the book appeared, Chevrolet had replaced the swing axles with a fully articulated rear suspension. The damage was done, however, and the Corvair went into a steep sales decline; it was discontinued in 1969. Although the Corvair came to a sad end, it and Oldsmobile managed to pioneer production-automobile turbocharging and demonstrate its potential. It would be another decade before it would return, this time from Porsche in the 1975 Turbo Carrera, ironically equipped with a Turbocharged Flat Six engine.

CarDomain Rides

There are plenty of Turbocharged Corvairs within the CarDomain community, so let’s take a look. Here is Lawrence’s 1963 Spyder Convertible, that he bought new. The car hails from Hoopeston, Illinois, and has just been thoroughly restored. It’s a very nice ride!

Here is Clark Griswold’s 1966 Corsa Coupe, with a lot updates including 17″ rear wheels. This is one very understated ride, so check it out.

So, could a Turbocharged Flat Six 2 Door Sport Coupe (or Convertible) ever be thought of as a Muscle Car, and does it deserve a place in the parking lot, or is it just an American interpretation of a European Sports Car? Remember, with this rudimentary early turbocharger, this 164 Cu In engine produced 180 HP, or more than one horsepower per cubic inch, which was the standard for the muscle car era. In it’s favor, it would out handle any domestic car, with the possible exception of the Corvette. So what do you have to say? I look forward to hearing from each and every one of you.

Comments

64Vert
Jun 14, 2009 at 12:51 am

More of a sports car than a muscle car, will never win any 1/4 miles but will knock the snot out of anything over a road corse.

jeeprules
Jun 8, 2009 at 1:48 pm

Look’s Sharp I Think!

lawrencel79
Jun 8, 2009 at 9:10 am

I had myself a Corvair in the late 80s, Had a lot of fun driving it around the city of San Diego. Love your story.

Garage510
Jun 8, 2009 at 2:09 am

I remember how the design of the Corvair was terribly downplayed during its time that everyone believed it was truly a “lemon” car. After all these years, that design came to explain and extricate itself from those critics. For me, the Corvair is one very nice car model that GM made.

bleeder
Jun 7, 2009 at 5:25 am

In 1965 my dad got the 1965 corvair corsa ,140 horse ,4 carb ,4 speed,rag top ,blue,looked just like the second picture,and i know for a fact it would do 125 m.p.h.- IN 1974 , when i turned 17, i got a 1964 corvair, 2 carb.164 c.i. it would top out at 108 m.p.h.I drove the crap out of that car, flying around corners,doing donuts ,never once had it up on two wheels .the people who knock the covairs ,never owned one.Where was RALPH NADER when all the FORD SUVs were flipping over killing whole families?

ZX10Ninja
Jun 6, 2009 at 6:09 pm

I love the Corvair, has always been one of my most loved. Muscle car it is not, was not and shouldn’t be considered. True to the word sports car yes. I feel muscle cars, all muscles cars, have to at least have a V8. Anything less or more shouldn’t me thought of as a MUSCLE car.

4Wheelin_Forever
Jun 6, 2009 at 6:06 pm

Unfortunatly I would have to say that its more of a sports car though.

4Wheelin_Forever
Jun 6, 2009 at 6:03 pm

These cars are amazing! I want the yellow one with a convertible top! My dad still has the ORIGINAL wooden shifter knob from his 65. That should tell you what he thinks of them. Of course, the other one that he has is housing a 283 C.I. V8. lol Ralph Nader can kiss my ass. That is one fool that didn’t know a darn thing about the car.

palefacetsw
Jun 6, 2009 at 6:01 pm

A guy here in Olivehurst, CA had a sandrail type dune-buggy on the Sacramento Craigslist a while back, powered by a turbo Corvair motor….

LedZeppelin
Jun 6, 2009 at 12:49 pm

It may not be a muscle car in the very sense of the word, however, it could sit next to the GTO’s, MOPAR’s, Cobra’s, Chargers, and other big Bore perfromance machines from thr true era of muscle machines. It is one of the very few small engined American cars that achieved legendary status that could occupy the same parlors filled with true Muscle cars.

And Ralph Nader can SUCK IT!

wsbob
Jun 6, 2009 at 11:43 am

Yeah I think u could call it a muscle car. Especially since this car eventually gave birth to the Camaro

rejybaby
Jun 6, 2009 at 6:32 am

Real clean and neat cars. I like the drawing.

Richter-Scale
Jun 6, 2009 at 6:30 am

Sports Car?

Vuurwa
Jun 6, 2009 at 6:00 am

My opinion is that it`s NOT a muscle car!…i like it of course and will take the yellow one please!??..thank you very much!

IH-international
Jun 4, 2009 at 7:41 pm

well as covair owner i would much want to say it is but it isn’t
its a sports car just as the first gen mustangs were
it would kick pretty much any muscle car on the track even beat porsches!!! they are awesome cars for track!!!

NobiZero
Jun 4, 2009 at 2:04 pm

If this is a muscle car, then so is a Porsche. It’s a sports car.

carguy1215
Jun 4, 2009 at 11:31 am

No, it’s not really a muscle car; more of a sporty car. Rear mounted, turbo charged flat six; too many differences from a traditional muscle car. However, I do like the one with the NJ historic plate saying F-Nader.

oldscoob
Jun 4, 2009 at 10:26 am

The first of anything is hardly a muscle car. It takes years of true drivers breaking things, analyzing handling, normal people and thier rust prone spots etc. If to have kept after this design, watching it evolve is a boxer fans daydream that never happened. Of course, porsche took over, in a tight stiff bouncy half bubble. The day they stopped the 3 main boxer four, is the day the true soul of power per cubic inch flew out the window as a beaten orphan growing into the homeless long haired crazed hippy prophet singing songs on a street corner….I admire the attempt. the engineering from a get go was all learn, learned fast..and never committed to. (hmm..what other millions of cars have this trait?) cheers to the restorers and current owners. It is an important history.

KrashKadillak
Jun 4, 2009 at 8:01 am

Thanks to owning a ’66 turbocharged Corsa in 1970, I can say I went over 100MPH – in a Corvair! Wish I still had it.

dgaf88
Jun 4, 2009 at 7:47 am

I don’t consider it a muscle car. Its more like a niche sporty car thing, strays too far from the typical muscle car design.

crazywhiteboy08
Jun 4, 2009 at 6:34 am

yeah there is a guy where i live that has to and he aint letting me drive them it might be becuase i am only 18

Alex Vickers
Jun 4, 2009 at 6:15 am

I consider it a muscle car. I can tell how GM got the styling idea for the Camaro.

Post a comment

Please login to CarDomain to post a comment.