

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodge Challenger SRT8 vs. Chevy Camaro Hennessey HPE550 vs. Ford Shelby Mustang GT500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/08/14/dodge-challenger-srt8-vs-chevy-camaro-hennessey-hpe550-vs-ford-shelby-mustang-gt500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/08/14/dodge-challenger-srt8-vs-chevy-camaro-hennessey-hpe550-vs-ford-shelby-mustang-gt500/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FordRulesAll</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/08/14/dodge-challenger-srt8-vs-chevy-camaro-hennessey-hpe550-vs-ford-shelby-mustang-gt500/comment-page-1/#comment-103811</link>
		<dc:creator>FordRulesAll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=25187#comment-103811</guid>
		<description>ChallengerRules, you make a good point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChallengerRules, you make a good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChallengerRules</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/08/14/dodge-challenger-srt8-vs-chevy-camaro-hennessey-hpe550-vs-ford-shelby-mustang-gt500/comment-page-1/#comment-103810</link>
		<dc:creator>ChallengerRules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=25187#comment-103810</guid>
		<description>MT does it again...  a factory built SRT8 vs a non-factory built Hennessey Camaro. How about comparing to virtually any of the Hennessey Challengers. If comparing a Hennessey Camaro, let&#039;s be fair and go with a Hennessey Challenger... lets say the HPE575, HPE600, HPE600 SC, HPE700 or HPE800.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MT does it again&#8230;  a factory built SRT8 vs a non-factory built Hennessey Camaro. How about comparing to virtually any of the Hennessey Challengers. If comparing a Hennessey Camaro, let&#8217;s be fair and go with a Hennessey Challenger&#8230; lets say the HPE575, HPE600, HPE600 SC, HPE700 or HPE800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 74Furyous</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/08/14/dodge-challenger-srt8-vs-chevy-camaro-hennessey-hpe550-vs-ford-shelby-mustang-gt500/comment-page-1/#comment-103809</link>
		<dc:creator>74Furyous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=25187#comment-103809</guid>
		<description>Let Mr Norm breath on the Challenger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let Mr Norm breath on the Challenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t-rey</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/08/14/dodge-challenger-srt8-vs-chevy-camaro-hennessey-hpe550-vs-ford-shelby-mustang-gt500/comment-page-1/#comment-103808</link>
		<dc:creator>t-rey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=25187#comment-103808</guid>
		<description>This wouldn&#039;t really change my want for an SRT challenger, but honestly, I wouldn&#039;t mind any of the cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This wouldn&#8217;t really change my want for an SRT challenger, but honestly, I wouldn&#8217;t mind any of the cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: troutster52</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/08/14/dodge-challenger-srt8-vs-chevy-camaro-hennessey-hpe550-vs-ford-shelby-mustang-gt500/comment-page-1/#comment-103807</link>
		<dc:creator>troutster52</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=25187#comment-103807</guid>
		<description>As much as I love the GT500, I do feel like this is an uneven match, especially for the Challenger.  With Camaros new hp numbers 300, and above 400, there really isn&#039;t a straight even matchup.  The SS and SRT8 are in the same ballpark but the Mustang is either way under with the GT or way above with the GT500.  I think a most realistic comparison is based on budget, as I believe the original review was done.  I say get the lowest option stick shift car under 25K of all three and see who does the best.  Even a 230 horse v6 mustang makes more power than a 289 2 barrel car did in the mustang early years, unmodified anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I love the GT500, I do feel like this is an uneven match, especially for the Challenger.  With Camaros new hp numbers 300, and above 400, there really isn&#8217;t a straight even matchup.  The SS and SRT8 are in the same ballpark but the Mustang is either way under with the GT or way above with the GT500.  I think a most realistic comparison is based on budget, as I believe the original review was done.  I say get the lowest option stick shift car under 25K of all three and see who does the best.  Even a 230 horse v6 mustang makes more power than a 289 2 barrel car did in the mustang early years, unmodified anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1lowscort</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/08/14/dodge-challenger-srt8-vs-chevy-camaro-hennessey-hpe550-vs-ford-shelby-mustang-gt500/comment-page-1/#comment-103806</link>
		<dc:creator>1lowscort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=25187#comment-103806</guid>
		<description>As it should be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it should be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

