

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2011 Mustang Engine Specs Released!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 68cougarx-r-7</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-116157</link>
		<dc:creator>68cougarx-r-7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-116157</guid>
		<description>Tsss, best engine ever, i have a 93 mustang 5.0 and man its one hell of an engine. For all you chevy guys you guys dont got nothing on ford. I be murdering 350 engines with my 302 by 10 car lanes LOL chevy can use a 454 block and we just need a 351W to smoke you guys. Ford Rules</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tsss, best engine ever, i have a 93 mustang 5.0 and man its one hell of an engine. For all you chevy guys you guys dont got nothing on ford. I be murdering 350 engines with my 302 by 10 car lanes LOL chevy can use a 454 block and we just need a 351W to smoke you guys. Ford Rules</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUSTANG 5.0</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105822</link>
		<dc:creator>JUSTANG 5.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105822</guid>
		<description>i DON&#039;T KNOW WHY EVERY THINKS THE NEW MUSTANG&#039;S POWER IS BAD? YA 315 ISN&#039;T THAT MUCH BUT THE CAMARO HAD SIX YEARS TO PREPARE FOR IT&#039;S RELEASE AND THE CHALLENGER AND CHARGER ARE AS HEAVY AS TANKS. SO THEY NEED ALL THAT HORSEPOWER TO MOVE THE THINGS A NEW GT IS FASTER THAN THE CHARGER OR CHALLENGER IN THE QUARTERMILE AND THE CAMARO WITH ALMOST OVER 100 MORE HP AND ABOUT 80 CUBIC INCHES BARELY BEATS IT.
A 5.0 MOD MOTOR WITH 400 HP IN THE SAME CHASSIS LOOKOUT CHEVY AN DODGE BOYS BETTER PULL THAT BELT TIGHT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i DON&#8217;T KNOW WHY EVERY THINKS THE NEW MUSTANG&#8217;S POWER IS BAD? YA 315 ISN&#8217;T THAT MUCH BUT THE CAMARO HAD SIX YEARS TO PREPARE FOR IT&#8217;S RELEASE AND THE CHALLENGER AND CHARGER ARE AS HEAVY AS TANKS. SO THEY NEED ALL THAT HORSEPOWER TO MOVE THE THINGS A NEW GT IS FASTER THAN THE CHARGER OR CHALLENGER IN THE QUARTERMILE AND THE CAMARO WITH ALMOST OVER 100 MORE HP AND ABOUT 80 CUBIC INCHES BARELY BEATS IT.<br />
A 5.0 MOD MOTOR WITH 400 HP IN THE SAME CHASSIS LOOKOUT CHEVY AN DODGE BOYS BETTER PULL THAT BELT TIGHT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1967f100</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105821</link>
		<dc:creator>1967f100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105821</guid>
		<description>I hope to see another muscle car war like the 60&#039;s. I still think Ford wil dominate unless things like the AAR Cuda came back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope to see another muscle car war like the 60&#8242;s. I still think Ford wil dominate unless things like the AAR Cuda came back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILLY-Sase</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105820</link>
		<dc:creator>ILLY-Sase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105820</guid>
		<description>V8&#039;s will live on, they will just make them more fuel efficient and adopt better emissions while at the same time keeping the power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V8&#8242;s will live on, they will just make them more fuel efficient and adopt better emissions while at the same time keeping the power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggunna</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105819</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggunna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105819</guid>
		<description>The V8 will live on cafe standards will only help it achieve better ratios. 5.0 has always been a good round number in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The V8 will live on cafe standards will only help it achieve better ratios. 5.0 has always been a good round number in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1967f100</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105818</link>
		<dc:creator>1967f100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105818</guid>
		<description>This is good news to all hardcore Ford lovers. I just put a 4.6 liter 4 cam v8 in my 67 f100 but I would kill for the new 400 horse 5.0. This is the best motor Ford has ever made and its nice to see it come back with old school chevy ass kick&#039;n power. Ford rules and Chevy drewels!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news to all hardcore Ford lovers. I just put a 4.6 liter 4 cam v8 in my 67 f100 but I would kill for the new 400 horse 5.0. This is the best motor Ford has ever made and its nice to see it come back with old school chevy ass kick&#8217;n power. Ford rules and Chevy drewels!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiamiMiataGroup</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105817</link>
		<dc:creator>MiamiMiataGroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105817</guid>
		<description>WOW ford doesn&#039;t have a taste for rims UGLY stuff. I wont personally think ford will be making the V8 larger after 2012. All V8 will die by 2016 when cafe standards kick in so why even bother. I will be sheer stupidity at is best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW ford doesn&#8217;t have a taste for rims UGLY stuff. I wont personally think ford will be making the V8 larger after 2012. All V8 will die by 2016 when cafe standards kick in so why even bother. I will be sheer stupidity at is best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Vickers</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105816</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Vickers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105816</guid>
		<description>Uh-oh, I made a mistake in my last comment. I meant to say it pulls 0.08 Gs MORE on the skidpad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh-oh, I made a mistake in my last comment. I meant to say it pulls 0.08 Gs MORE on the skidpad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILLY-Sase</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105801</link>
		<dc:creator>ILLY-Sase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105801</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Chevy man myself. and I say it&#039;s about time...LET THE HORSEPOWER WARS BEGIN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Chevy man myself. and I say it&#8217;s about time&#8230;LET THE HORSEPOWER WARS BEGIN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wsbob</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/09/04/2011-mustang-engine-specs-released/comment-page-1/#comment-105815</link>
		<dc:creator>wsbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=27053#comment-105815</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s more like it... Sounds like Ford is really gearing up a new stage in the Horsepower war</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s more like it&#8230; Sounds like Ford is really gearing up a new stage in the Horsepower war</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

