

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IROC vs. 5.0: Which Would You Choose?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/</link>
	<description>CarDomain Blog - Crazy news and CarDomain Finds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MP81Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110585</link>
		<dc:creator>MP81Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110585</guid>
		<description>IROC FTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IROC FTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenix_rising</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110584</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenix_rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110584</guid>
		<description>camaro ftmfw! these camaro has more style, grace, and powertoday as it did nearly 25 years ago. but I would rather have a trans am than either one of these. I love me some potiacs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>camaro ftmfw! these camaro has more style, grace, and powertoday as it did nearly 25 years ago. but I would rather have a trans am than either one of these. I love me some potiacs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferrari458</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110583</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferrari458</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110583</guid>
		<description>Mustang 5.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mustang 5.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blubyu87gt</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110582</link>
		<dc:creator>blubyu87gt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110582</guid>
		<description>When faced with this same decision I went with both haha They are equally fun to drive and both have similar mods but still the Fox is the faster and does handle better. Main thing I dislike about the Z is the auto only for the 350 and the Y pipe single exhaust crap.  For the Fox it has to be the four lug and pinto-esq rear drums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When faced with this same decision I went with both haha They are equally fun to drive and both have similar mods but still the Fox is the faster and does handle better. Main thing I dislike about the Z is the auto only for the 350 and the Y pipe single exhaust crap.  For the Fox it has to be the four lug and pinto-esq rear drums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RustyS10</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110581</link>
		<dc:creator>RustyS10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110581</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d go with the iroc... but i&#039;d prefer its trans am gta counterpart, they look much better in my opinion... those mustangs definatly look like escorts and are more cramped under the hood than my S10! I hate working on mustangs but they are definatly lighter... not to mention the chevy 350 has a WAY bigger aftermarket than the mustang, 80% of the jegs site is for smallblocks dart and world make twice as many smallblocks as fords</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go with the iroc&#8230; but i&#8217;d prefer its trans am gta counterpart, they look much better in my opinion&#8230; those mustangs definatly look like escorts and are more cramped under the hood than my S10! I hate working on mustangs but they are definatly lighter&#8230; not to mention the chevy 350 has a WAY bigger aftermarket than the mustang, 80% of the jegs site is for smallblocks dart and world make twice as many smallblocks as fords</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josejsilva88</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110580</link>
		<dc:creator>josejsilva88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110580</guid>
		<description>Chevy Baby!! The camero has more potential and is way better looking... I wonder why artist always sing and rap about Chevys!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chevy Baby!! The camero has more potential and is way better looking&#8230; I wonder why artist always sing and rap about Chevys!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monteman777</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110579</link>
		<dc:creator>monteman777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110579</guid>
		<description>When I saw this, I just had to post. IROC ALL THE WAY!!!

The Fox bodies look too much like Escorts, they have no style. Plus the Camaro has much more potential (especially if you swap an LSX engine in).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw this, I just had to post. IROC ALL THE WAY!!!</p>
<p>The Fox bodies look too much like Escorts, they have no style. Plus the Camaro has much more potential (especially if you swap an LSX engine in).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BAD-54</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110578</link>
		<dc:creator>BAD-54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110578</guid>
		<description>5.0 for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.0 for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sepno77</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110577</link>
		<dc:creator>Sepno77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110577</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take the ford w/ a chevy engine in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take the ford w/ a chevy engine in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KustomKiely</title>
		<link>http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/11/18/iroc-vs-5-0-which-would-you-choose/comment-page-2/#comment-110576</link>
		<dc:creator>KustomKiely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cardomain.com/?p=32896#comment-110576</guid>
		<description>Chevy Camaro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chevy Camaro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

