Comments on: IROC vs. 5.0: Too Close to Call!

By: GTwildfire

GTwildfire — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:34:54 +0000

I’m undeniably a GM dude, but I really like this tie. I do!
-
I think it’s awesome in fact.
-
Those who prefer the ‘Stang deserve respect, just as those of us who prefer the Camaro or Firebird do.
-
I’ve considered and checked out some stangs in the past when looking to buy. I didn’t bite bu won’t rule anything out for the future. I was just lured more by the 4th gen, F bodies. I think they handle better but I’m not bashin’.
-
This tie is anything but a disappointment.

By: lejourinator

lejourinator — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:21:16 +0000

I wouldn’t mind beating the crap out of the 5.0 on a track. But I want a good looking car to drive around in during summer. IROC ftw. Just tune it up a bit and its fine.

By: ebay motors | news bytes

ebay motors | news bytes — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:20:23 +0000

[...] IROC vs. 5.0: Too Close to Call! – CarDomain Blog This week’s ebay Motors Showdown really hit a chord with people. Even with our ongoing commenting issues (now even I can’t comment, and yes, we are working on it) we got a HUGE response on this one. [...]

By: JoeCool97Formula

JoeCool97Formula — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:36:16 +0000

MUSTANG FTW! That 3rd gen Camaro was SUPER SLOW.

By: RareT

RareT — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:18:08 +0000

Camaro has the lower mileage, yet the Mustang has been updated. Tough decision, but I’d go for the IROC.

By: meangreenlx50

meangreenlx50 — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:55:15 +0000

The long production run and numerous aftermarket suppliers has made the 5.0 the “57 Chevy” of the current era. Faster than the auto only 350 IROC, lighter and cheaper. How can you not chose the Mustang.

By: blubyu87gt

blubyu87gt — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:13:01 +0000

I was faced with this same decision a few years ago… I just decided to go with both of them! Check my profile for the pix and info.