« The Toffee Apple AE71 CarDomain Blog Home Honda CRX Overpass Crash »
February 10, 2010
CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot: The 1973-74 Buick Century Gran Sport
By Jim Brennan
UDMan
Welcome to another edition of the CarDomain Obscure Muscle Car Parking Lot where we discover hidden gems that you may have never known about, and I try and convince you that they are worthy of the muscle car designation. There is no doubt that Buick made muscle during the later half of the 60s, right up to 1972 with the Skylark GS and GSX. These were deemed as the gentleman’s muscle car, one that spoke softly and carried a big stick. However, Buick was about to introduce a new line of mid-sized cars, and they dusted off an old nameplate, Century. They didn’t completely ignore the performance and youth market though, and that is where this model comes in, the Buick Century Gran Sport, with the 455, for 1973 and 74.
Continue reading after the jump!

1973 was a year of transformation for GM, especially for the intermediate models. Gone was the pillar less hardtop coupes and sedans, the convertible was reserved only for the full sized cars, and in their place was a new type of styling called “Collonade”. This was an attempt for GM to get ahead of the pending federal traffic regulations that would have dictated roll over standards, and which failed to materialize. While the Muscle Car purists mourned the loss of the graceful hardtop coupe, their replacements actually sold in overwhelming numbers. Buick’s take on the “Collonade” style was like the rest of the GM divisions, with two models showing two different roof styles in the two door variety. The Century shows the thin pillar, semi fastback roof line – shared with the LeMans, Chevelle, and Cutlass – while the Regal utilized the more upright formal roof line, which it shared with the Grand Prix, Monte Carlo, and Cutlass Supreme.

The Gran Sport Option for the Century was really nothing more that a tape stripe and blacked out trim grouping. Base engine was the Buick manufactured 350 CID V-8, belting out a relatively tame 175 HP. A 4 BBL Carb increased the horsepower rating to 190. But the real performance engines were the two different 455 CID V-8s. The standard issue 455 could belt out 225 Horsepower, while the 455 Stage 1 pumped out an astonishing 270 Horsepower. (Remember this was during the mid 70′s.) Transmission choices for the Gran Sport ranged from a 3 Speed Manual – good luck finding a car with one of those – to a Muncie M-21 4 Speed, or one of two Turbohydramatic 3 Speed Automatics. Only the Automatic was offered on the Stage 1 equipped Gran Sports.

Production of the 455 equipped Century Gran Sports were few, with almost 980 in 1973, and fewer than 580 for 1974. Stage 1′s were even fewer, with only around 730 for 1973, and 478 for 1974. Performance – of which you can see in the video below – was pretty good for 1973, with 0-70 times of 10.4 seconds, and a quarter mile time of 15.3 seconds, right from the showroom.

CarDomain Members Rides
There is not one 1973 or 1974 Buick Century Gran Sport in the CarDomain community, but I did find a couple of equally compelling Buick Centurys. Check out this Century Gran Sport wannabe. This is John’s Drag Car from Toledo Ohio. Check it out and leave John a message of encouragement.
Here’s a Stage 1 equipped Buick Century Regal. The CarDomain member is Spencer, and it’s his Dad’s car. Check under the hood to see what a monster that 455 Stage 1 Buick mill looks like.
There you have it, a big Buick that was only produced (with the 455) for a couple of years, and with less than 2,000 built. Should this Buick be considered as an Obscure Muscle Car, and does it belong on the lot, or should it just be dismissed as Grandpa’s old Buick, and put into a retirement home? I look forward to hearing from each of you, and remember to keep those suggestions coming in.

Comments
Post a comment
Please login to CarDomain to post a comment.

0
0


moonmastershake
Feb 12, 2010 at 10:38 am
My father raced GM motors in these body type’s like the Riviera, Century, Grand National, Gran Prix. A 400 cid pumping 12:1 doesn’t fit in a graceful car.
A 455 cid (chills run up my spine) is like the arm that swings a hammer.
A two ton car like the ones mentioned remind me of a claw hammer. Get the picture? I think a fan of primitive power sources has to be a fan of the car that it came in. No matter how ugly it is. You don’t make love to a car, you beat the snot out of it and the road it rides on. I love a gorgeous sports car, it would be a scalpel. What macho man alway’s has patience to skillfully operate? I want a hammer sometimes. A hammer is graceful when it’s beating the crap out of something.
wsbob
Feb 12, 2010 at 10:16 am
Yes definitely a muscle car, especially since its a smaller body
ShadeTree86
Feb 12, 2010 at 8:50 am
If this qualifies as a Muscle Car you’re scraping the bottom of the barrel for new additions to keep this topic alive. Obscure Model, yes. Muscle Car, NO!
olds68
Feb 11, 2010 at 4:17 pm
What a sleeper!
KrashingV8
Feb 11, 2010 at 3:51 pm
well ford and dodge made ugly cars right?? but they did have some good muscle cars. gm is no different. it is ugly but it is a muscle car.
73pontithang
Feb 11, 2010 at 12:12 am
the century looks just like my 73 lemans sport coupe. nice
90xjpunk
Feb 10, 2010 at 6:06 pm
agreed on the front view, hideous. side view on the blue one however looks sick.
retroman
Feb 10, 2010 at 4:16 pm
Definitely a muscle car… It’s a shame that GM didn’t offer something more performance oriented for the year of Century I own. It’s a 2000.
troutster52
Feb 10, 2010 at 9:05 am
Muscle car, Yes. Good-looking car, No.
SouthernGuy8503
Feb 10, 2010 at 7:36 am
i think its easy to say that its a muscle car
—
i don’t exactly like the front that much, its not completely ugly but i don’t really like it, i guess its one of those things i’d have to get used to, but if you de-badge it the car will just looks like grandmas daily driver which is a good thing, would have been a good sleeper back then in the 70s if it was de-badged